dc.contributor.author
Hua, Kevin
dc.contributor.author
Cummings, Mike
dc.contributor.author
Bernatik, Miriam
dc.contributor.author
Brinkhaus, Benno
dc.contributor.author
Usichenko, Taras
dc.contributor.author
Dietzel, Joanna
dc.date.accessioned
2024-05-31T10:36:26Z
dc.date.available
2024-05-31T10:36:26Z
dc.identifier.uri
https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/43711
dc.identifier.uri
http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/refubium-43426
dc.description.abstract
Background: The number of randomized controlled trials using auricular stimulation (AS) such as transauricular vagus nerve stimulation, or other auricular electrostimulation or auricular acupuncture or acupressure, in experimental and clinical settings, has increased markedly over the last three decades. This systematic review focusses on cardiovascular effects of auricular stimulation.
Methods and analysis: The following databases were searched: MEDLINE (PubMed), EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), ISI Web of Science, and Scopus Database. RCTs were reviewed that had been published in English and European languages. Data collection and analysis was conducted by two reviewers independently. Quality and risk assessment of included studies was performed and the meta-analysis of the effect of the most frequently assessed biomarkers.
Results: Altogether, 78 trials were included. 38 studies assessed heart rate (HR), 19 studies analyzed heart rate variability (HRV), 31 studies analyzed blood pressure (BP) and 7 studies were identified that measured oxygen saturation (O2), 2 studies on baroreflex sensitivity and 2 studies on skin conductance were evaluated in this review. 26 studies contained continuous data and were eligible for meta-analysis, 50 trials reported non continuous data and were evaluated descriptively. The overall quality of the studies was moderate to low. AS leads to a significant reduction of HR, the changes though were not considered an adverse reaction. Furthermore, when looking at HRV, AS was able to reduce the LF/HF ratio significantly compared to control procedures. No other cardiovascular parameters (blood pressure, oxygen saturation, baroreflex sensitivity) were changed significantly. AS produced only minor side effects in all trials.
Conclusion: AS can lead to clinically safe reduction of HR and changes in the LF/HF ratio of the HRV, which is presumably via an increase in vagal activity. More research is needed to clarify whether AS can be used to modulate tachycardia or indications with autonomic imbalance.
Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=231885 PROSPERO, ID CRD42021231885.
en
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject
auricular acupuncture
en
dc.subject
auricular stimulation
en
dc.subject
cardiovascular
en
dc.subject
randomized controlled trials
en
dc.subject
systematic review
en
dc.subject
transauricular vagus nerve stimulation
en
dc.subject.ddc
600 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften::610 Medizin und Gesundheit::610 Medizin und Gesundheit
dc.title
Cardiovascular effects of auricular stimulation -a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled clinical trials
dc.type
Wissenschaftlicher Artikel
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.articlenumber
1227858
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.doi
10.3389/fnins.2023.1227858
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.journaltitle
Frontiers in Neuroscience
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.originalpublishername
Frontiers Media SA
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.volume
17
refubium.affiliation
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
refubium.resourceType.isindependentpub
no
dcterms.accessRights.openaire
open access
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pmid
37727325
dcterms.isPartOf.eissn
1662-453X