dc.contributor.author
Benzmüller, Christoph
dc.contributor.author
Fuenmayor, David
dc.contributor.author
Lomfeld, Bertram
dc.date.accessioned
2024-05-16T15:42:46Z
dc.date.available
2024-05-16T15:42:46Z
dc.identifier.uri
https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/43588
dc.identifier.uri
http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/refubium-43304
dc.description.abstract
The logico-pluralist LogiKEy knowledge engineering methodology and framework is applied to the modelling of a theory of legal balancing, in which legal knowledge (cases and laws) is encoded by utilising context-dependent value preferences. The theory obtained is then used to formalise, automatically evaluate, and reconstruct illustrative property law cases (involving the appropriation of wild animals) within the Isabelle/HOL proof assistant system, illustrating how LogiKEy can harness interactive and automated theorem-proving technology to provide a testbed for the development and formal verification of legal domain-specific languages and theories. Modelling value-oriented legal reasoning in that framework, we establish novel bridges between the latest research in knowledge representation and reasoning in non-classical logics, automated theorem proving, and applications in legal reasoning.
en
dc.format.extent
48 Seiten
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject
legal balancing
en
dc.subject
value-oriented reasoning
en
dc.subject
automated theorem proving
en
dc.subject.ddc
000 Informatik, Informationswissenschaft, allgemeine Werke::000 Informatik, Wissen, Systeme::000 Informatik, Informationswissenschaft, allgemeine Werke
dc.subject.ddc
300 Sozialwissenschaften::340 Recht::340 Recht
dc.title
Modelling Value-Oriented Legal Reasoning in LogiKEy
dc.type
Wissenschaftlicher Artikel
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.doi
10.3390/logics2010003
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.journaltitle
Logics
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.number
1
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.originalpublishername
MDPI
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pagestart
31
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pageend
78
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.volume
2
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.url
https://doi.org/10.3390/logics2010003
refubium.affiliation
Mathematik und Informatik
refubium.affiliation
Rechtswissenschaft
refubium.resourceType.isindependentpub
no
dcterms.accessRights.openaire
open access
dcterms.isPartOf.eissn
2813-0405