dc.contributor.author
Elati, Khawla
dc.contributor.author
Daly, Nesrine
dc.contributor.author
Dhibi, Mokhtar
dc.contributor.author
Laaribi, Hela
dc.contributor.author
Rekik, Mourad
dc.contributor.author
Gharbi, Mohamed
dc.date.accessioned
2024-04-15T13:28:17Z
dc.date.available
2024-04-15T13:28:17Z
dc.identifier.uri
https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/43237
dc.identifier.uri
http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/refubium-42953
dc.description.abstract
Sheep ectoparasites such as chewing lice, fleas and ticks are serious constraints to sheep productivity and are the cause of skin lesions in animals that decrease their market value. This study aims at investigating the ectoparasite fauna infesting small ruminants in the district of Sidi Bouzid (central Tunisia). A total of 1243 Barbarine and Queue Fine de l’Ouest (QFO) sheep were examined every two months for one year. Of the total animals examined, 74 were infested by at least 1 parasite group (5.95%). Three ectoparasite groups were identified as Psoroptes ovis (0.48%; 6/1243), ticks (5.3%; n = 66/1243) and one specimen of Ctenocephalides canis (0.08%; n = 1/1243). The most abundant tick among the 358 specimens was Rhipicephalus sanguineus sensu lato (n = 337; 94.1%), followed by Hyalomma impeltatum (n = 7/358; 1.9%), H. dromedarii (n = 7/358; 1.9%), H. excavatum (n = 5/358; 1.4%) and only two specimens of H. scupense (n = 2/358; 0.55%). The sheep herds showed low infestation prevalence by ectoparasite over the year, with a significant difference according to the seasons (p < 0.05). A higher infestation prevalence was recorded in March (14.36%). Barbarine sheep breed showed significantly higher infestation prevalence (16.8%) compared to QFO (0.8%) (p < 0.01). There were no differences in infestation prevalence according to sex of the animal or age groups. Knowledge of the ectoparasite population harboured by sheep, its activity dynamics and risk factors is required to develop effective ectoparasite control options. The low prevalence of ectoparasite infestation in sheep reported here may be due to possible genetic resistance or simply to successful hygiene measures implemented by farmers.
en
dc.format.extent
12 Seiten
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject
Psoroptes ovis
en
dc.subject
Ctenocephalides canis
en
dc.subject
ectoparasites
en
dc.subject.ddc
600 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften::610 Medizin und Gesundheit::616 Krankheiten
dc.subject.ddc
600 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften::630 Landwirtschaft::630 Landwirtschaft und verwandte Bereiche
dc.title
Repeated Cross-Sectional Survey of Ectoparasites in Sheep from Central Tunisia: Does Low Prevalence Indicate Good Hygiene or Resistance to Ectoparasites?
dc.type
Wissenschaftlicher Artikel
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.articlenumber
801
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.doi
10.3390/ani14050801
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.journaltitle
Animals
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.number
5
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.originalpublishername
MDPI
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.volume
14
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.url
https://doi.org/10.3390/ani14050801
refubium.affiliation
Veterinärmedizin
refubium.affiliation.other
Institut für Parasitologie und Tropenveterinärmedizin
refubium.affiliation.other
Tiermedizinisches Zentrum für Resistenzforschung (TZR)
refubium.note.author
Die Publikation wurde aus Open Access Publikationsgeldern der Freien Universität Berlin gefördert.
de
refubium.resourceType.isindependentpub
no
dcterms.accessRights.openaire
open access
dcterms.isPartOf.eissn
2076-2615