dc.contributor.author
Kader, Avan
dc.contributor.author
Kaufmann, Jan O.
dc.contributor.author
Mangarova, Dilyana B.
dc.contributor.author
Moeckel, Jana
dc.contributor.author
Adams, Lisa C.
dc.contributor.author
Brangsch, Julia
dc.contributor.author
Heyl, Jennifer L.
dc.contributor.author
Zhao, Jing
dc.contributor.author
Verlemann, Christine
dc.contributor.author
Karst, Uwe
dc.contributor.author
Collettini, Federico
dc.contributor.author
Auer, Timo A.
dc.contributor.author
Hamm, Bernd
dc.contributor.author
Makowski, Marcus R.
dc.date.accessioned
2024-04-09T08:46:45Z
dc.date.available
2024-04-09T08:46:45Z
dc.identifier.uri
https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/43088
dc.identifier.uri
http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/refubium-42804
dc.description.abstract
Constant interactions between tumor cells and the extracellular matrix (ECM) influence the progression of prostate cancer (PCa). One of the key components of the ECM are collagen fibers, since they are responsible for the tissue stiffness, growth, adhesion, proliferation, migration, invasion/metastasis, cell signaling, and immune recruitment of tumor cells. To explore this molecular marker in the content of PCa, we investigated two different tumor volumes (500 mm(3) and 1000 mm(3)) of a xenograft mouse model of PCa with molecular magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) using a collagen-specific probe. For in vivo MRI evaluation, T1-weighted sequences before and after probe administration were analyzed. No significant signal difference between the two tumor volumes could be found. However, we detected a significant difference between the signal intensity of the peripheral tumor area and the central area of the tumor, at both 500 mm(3) (p < 0.01, n = 16) and at 1000 mm(3) (p < 0.01, n = 16). The results of our histologic analyses confirmed the in vivo studies: There was no significant difference in the amount of collagen between the two tumor volumes (p > 0.05), but within the tumor, higher collagen expression was observed in the peripheral area compared with the central area of the tumor. Laser ablation with inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry further confirmed these results. The 1000 mm(3) tumors contained 2.8 +/- 1.0% collagen and the 500 mm(3) tumors contained 3.2 +/- 1.2% (n = 16). There was a strong correlation between the in vivo MRI data and the ex vivo histological data (y = -0.068x + 1.1; R-2 = 0.74) (n = 16). The results of elemental analysis by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry supported the MRI data (y = 3.82x + 0.56; R-2 = 0.79; n = 7). MRI with the collagen-specific probe in PCa enables differentiation between different tumor areas. This may help to differentiate tumor from healthy tissue, potentially identifying tumor areas with a specific tumor biology.
en
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject
molecular imaging
en
dc.subject
magnetic resonance imaging
en
dc.subject
prostate cancer
en
dc.subject.ddc
600 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften::610 Medizin und Gesundheit::610 Medizin und Gesundheit
dc.title
Collagen-Specific Molecular Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Prostate Cancer
dc.type
Wissenschaftlicher Artikel
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.articlenumber
711
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.doi
10.3390/ijms24010711
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.journaltitle
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.number
1
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.originalpublishername
MDPI AG
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.volume
24
refubium.affiliation
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
refubium.resourceType.isindependentpub
no
dcterms.accessRights.openaire
open access
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pmid
36614152
dcterms.isPartOf.eissn
1422-0067