dc.contributor.author
Schulze, Julian
dc.contributor.author
Heinrich, Manuel
dc.contributor.author
Freudenstein, Jan-Philipp
dc.contributor.author
Schäpers, Philipp
dc.contributor.author
Krumm, Stefan
dc.date.accessioned
2024-09-23T05:42:47Z
dc.date.available
2024-09-23T05:42:47Z
dc.identifier.uri
https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/42783
dc.identifier.uri
http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/refubium-42499
dc.description.abstract
In typical Dark Triad (DT) questionnaires, generic items oftentimes refer to “others” or “people” in general. Hence, respondents have to mentally aggregate their behavior across several kinds of “others” (e.g., work colleagues, family members, and friends). It remains unknown if individuals consider different kinds of interaction partners equally or if their self-reports contain “hidden” interaction partner-specific tendencies. To shed light on this issue, we assessed generic and contextualized DT items (referring to family, friends, work, and strangers; N = 814 from the general population). The correlated trait-correlated (method − 1) model was used to investigate preregistered research questions. On average, generic DT items showed the strongest association with work-contextualized DT items and the weakest association with family-contextualized DT items. However, the associations varied considerably across DT items and traits. In sum, our results suggest that hidden framings exist in some DT items, which may impact their ability to predict relevant criteria due to contextual (a)symmetries. The generalizability of the findings to other DT instruments, items, and participant groups should be examined in future research.
en
dc.format.extent
21 Seiten
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject
frame-of-reference
en
dc.subject
symmetry principle
en
dc.subject
interpersonal
en
dc.subject.ddc
100 Philosophie und Psychologie::150 Psychologie::150 Psychologie
dc.title
Uncovering Hidden Framings in Dark Triad Self-Ratings: What Frames-of-Reference Do People Use When Responding to Generic Dark Triad Items?
dc.type
Wissenschaftlicher Artikel
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.doi
10.1177/10731911231220357
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.journaltitle
Assessment
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.number
7
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pagestart
1472
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pageend
1492
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.volume
31
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.url
https://doi.org/10.1177/10731911231220357
refubium.affiliation
Erziehungswissenschaft und Psychologie
refubium.affiliation.other
Arbeitsbereich Psychologische Diagnostik, Differentielle und Persönlichkeitspsychologie
refubium.note.author
Die Publikation wurde aus Open Access Publikationsgeldern der Freien Universität Berlin gefördert.
de
refubium.resourceType.isindependentpub
no
dcterms.accessRights.openaire
open access
dcterms.isPartOf.eissn
1552-3489
refubium.resourceType.provider
WoS-Alert