dc.contributor.author
Wainaina, Martin
dc.contributor.author
Vey da Silva, David Attuy
dc.contributor.author
Dohoo, Ian
dc.contributor.author
Mayer-Scholl, Anne
dc.contributor.author
Roesel, Kristina
dc.contributor.author
Hofreuter, Dirk
dc.contributor.author
Roesler, Uwe
dc.contributor.author
Lindahl, Johanna
dc.contributor.author
Bett, Bernard
dc.contributor.author
Al Dahouk, Sascha
dc.date.accessioned
2024-01-23T12:43:53Z
dc.date.available
2024-01-23T12:43:53Z
dc.identifier.uri
https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/42156
dc.identifier.uri
http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/refubium-41881
dc.description.abstract
Background
The awareness of non-malarial febrile illnesses (NMFIs) has been on the rise over the last decades. Therefore, we undertook a systematic literature review and meta-analysis of causative agents of non-malarial fevers on the African continent.
Methodology
We searched for literature in African Journals Online, EMBASE, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases to identify aetiologic agents that had been reported and to determine summary estimates of the proportional morbidity rates (PMr) associated with these pathogens among fever patients.
Findings
A total of 133 studies comprising 391,835 patients from 25 of the 54 African countries were eligible. A wide array of aetiologic agents were described with considerable regional differences among the leading agents. Overall, bacterial pathogens tested from blood samples accounted for the largest proportion. The summary estimates from the meta-analysis were low for most of the agents. This may have resulted from a true low prevalence of the agents, the failure to test for many agents or the low sensitivity of the diagnostic methods applied. Our meta-regression analysis of study and population variables showed that diagnostic methods determined the PMr estimates of typhoidal Salmonella and Dengue virus. An increase in the PMr of Klebsiella spp. infections was observed over time. Furthermore, the status of patients as either inpatient or outpatient predicted the PMr of Haemophilus spp. infections.
Conclusion
The small number of epidemiological studies and the variety of NMFI agents on the African continent emphasizes the need for harmonized studies with larger sample sizes. In particular, diagnostic procedures for NMFIs should be standardized to facilitate comparability of study results and to improve future meta-analyses. Reliable NMFI burden estimates will inform regional public health strategies.
en
dc.format.extent
29 Seiten
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject
non-malarial febrile illnesses
en
dc.subject
aetiological agents
en
dc.subject
meta-analysis
en
dc.subject.ddc
500 Naturwissenschaften und Mathematik::570 Biowissenschaften; Biologie::570 Biowissenschaften; Biologie
dc.title
A systematic review and meta-analysis of the aetiological agents of non-malarial febrile illnesses in Africa
dc.type
Wissenschaftlicher Artikel
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.articlenumber
e0010144
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.doi
10.1371/journal.pntd.0010144
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.journaltitle
PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.volume
16
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.url
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0010144
refubium.affiliation
Veterinärmedizin
refubium.affiliation.other
Institut für Tier- und Umwelthygiene
refubium.resourceType.isindependentpub
no
dcterms.accessRights.openaire
open access
dcterms.isPartOf.eissn
1935-2735
refubium.resourceType.provider
WoS-Alert