dc.contributor.author
Minichmayr, Iris K.
dc.contributor.author
Wicha, Sebastian G.
dc.contributor.author
Matzneller, Peter
dc.contributor.author
Kloft, Charlotte
dc.contributor.author
Zeitlinger, Markus
dc.date.accessioned
2024-01-19T10:01:43Z
dc.date.available
2024-01-19T10:01:43Z
dc.identifier.uri
https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/42115
dc.identifier.uri
http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/refubium-41840
dc.description.abstract
Background and Objective
Ceftaroline fosamil is a β-lactam antibiotic approved as a 600 mg twice daily dose (≤1 h infusion, ‘standard dosing’) or a 600 mg thrice daily dose (2 h infusion) to treat complicated skin and soft tissue infections caused by Staphylococcus aureus (minimum inhibitory concentration [MIC] 2–4 mg/L). We sought to systematically evaluate the relative impact of the three key components of the intensified dosing regimen (i.e. shortened dosing interval, prolonged infusion duration and increased total daily dose [TDD]) on the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) target attainment given different grades of bacterial susceptibility.
Methods
A population PK model was developed using data from 12 healthy volunteers (EudraCT-2012-005134-11) receiving standard or intensified dosing. PK/PD target attainment (ƒT>MIC = 35% and 100%) after 24 h was compared following systematically varied combinations of the (1) dosing interval (every 12 h [q12h]→ every 8 h [q8h]); (2) infusion duration (1 h→2 h); and (3) individual and total daily dose (400→900 mg, i.e. TDD 1200→1800 mg), as well as for varying susceptibility of S. aureus (MIC 0.032–8 mg/L).
Results
A two-compartment model with linear elimination adequately described ceftaroline concentrations (n = 274). The relevance of the dosing components dosing interval/infusion duration/TDD for ƒT>MIC systematically changed with pathogen susceptibility. For susceptible pathogens with MIC ≤1 mg/L, shortened dosing intervals appeared as the main driver of the improved target attainment associated with the intensified dosing regimen, followed by increased TDD and infusion duration. For less susceptible pathogens, the advantage of q8h dosing and 2 h infusions declined, and increased TDD improved ƒT>MIC the most.
Conclusion
The analysis calls to mind consideration of dose increases when prolonging the infusion duration in the case of low bacterial susceptibility.
en
dc.format.extent
11 Seiten
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject
Ceftaroline Dosing
en
dc.subject
Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Target Attainment
en
dc.subject.ddc
600 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften::610 Medizin und Gesundheit::615 Pharmakologie, Therapeutik
dc.title
Impact of Key Components of Intensified Ceftaroline Dosing on Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Target Attainment
dc.type
Wissenschaftlicher Artikel
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.doi
10.1007/s40262-023-01325-4
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.journaltitle
Clinical Pharmacokinetics
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.number
1
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pagestart
121
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pageend
131
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.volume
63
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.url
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40262-023-01325-4
refubium.affiliation
Biologie, Chemie, Pharmazie
refubium.affiliation.other
Institut für Pharmazie
refubium.resourceType.isindependentpub
no
dcterms.accessRights.openaire
open access
dcterms.isPartOf.eissn
1179-1926
refubium.resourceType.provider
WoS-Alert