dc.contributor.author
Röder, M.
dc.contributor.author
Borchardt, S.
dc.contributor.author
Heuwieser, W.
dc.contributor.author
Rauch, E.
dc.contributor.author
Sargent, R.
dc.contributor.author
Sutter, F.
dc.date.accessioned
2024-01-04T11:09:31Z
dc.date.available
2024-01-04T11:09:31Z
dc.identifier.uri
https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/41939
dc.identifier.uri
http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/refubium-41661
dc.description.abstract
The objectives of this study were to evaluate different analytical methods to determine colostrum quality in dairy cattle, including one laboratory-based method (ELISA) and 4 on-farm tests. We hypothesized that the colostral IgG concentration using different analytical methods, such as ELISA (mg/mL), digital Brix refractometer (% Brix), colostrometer (specific gravity and mg/mL), an outflow funnel (seconds), and a lateral flow assay (mg/mL), were highly correlated with the reference method, radial immunodiffusion (RID; mg/mL) and would generate comparable results. Colostrum samples were collected from 209 Holstein Friesian cows on 2 commercial dairy farms in Germany. Colostrum weight and colostrum temperature were measured. Test characteristics, such as optimum thresholds, sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC) were determined using a receiver operating characteristic curve analyses for each test. Out of 209 colostrum samples assessed by RID, 186 (89%) samples had high quality (≥50 mg IgG/mL), while 23 colostrum samples (11%) showed poor quality with IgG concentrations less than 50 mg/mL. The mean IgG concentration (±SD) was 101.3 ± 45.9 mg/mL and the range was 6.0 to 244.3 mg/mL. The Pearson correlation coefficient (r) between RID and ELISA was r = 0.78. In comparison to RID, Pearson correlation coefficients for the on-farm tests were: r = 0.79 (digital Brix refractometry), r = 0.58 (colostrometer: specific gravity), r = 0.61 (colostrometer: temperature corrected), r = 0.26 (outflow funnel) and r = 0.43 (lateral flow assay), respectively. The optimal threshold to identify high-quality colostrum using ELISA was 50.8 mg/mL with sensitivity 91.3%, specificity 92.3%, and AUC of 0.94. For the on-farm tests sensitivity ranged from 95.7% (Brix refractometry) to 60.9% (lateral flow assay). Specificity ranged from 88.6% (lateral flow assay) to 75.9% (colostrometer: temperature corrected). The AUC ranged from 0.93 (Brix refractometry) to 0.73 (outflow funnel). Based on the AUC, ELISA (0.94) and Brix refractometry (0.93) can be considered highly accurate. In conclusion, the ELISA is accurate to assess colostrum quality. Regarding the on-farm tests only the digital Brix refractometer and the colostrometer were adequate to determine colostrum quality.
en
dc.format.extent
10 Seiten
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject
colostrum quality
en
dc.subject
on-farm test
en
dc.subject
colostrum management
en
dc.subject.ddc
600 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften::630 Landwirtschaft::630 Landwirtschaft und verwandte Bereiche
dc.title
Evaluation of laboratory and on-farm tests to estimate colostrum quality for dairy cows
dc.type
Wissenschaftlicher Artikel
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.doi
10.3168/jds.2023-23467
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.journaltitle
Journal of Dairy Science
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.number
12
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pagestart
9164
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pageend
9173
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.volume
106 (2023)
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.url
https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2023-23467
refubium.affiliation
Veterinärmedizin
refubium.funding
Publikationsfonds FU
refubium.note.author
We acknowledge support by the Open Access Publication Fund of the Freie Universität Berlin.
en
refubium.resourceType.isindependentpub
no
dcterms.accessRights.openaire
open access
dcterms.isPartOf.issn
0022-0302
dcterms.isPartOf.eissn
1525-3198