dc.contributor.author
Gorodetski, Boris
dc.contributor.author
Becker, Philipp Hendrik
dc.contributor.author
Baur, Alexander Daniel Jacques
dc.contributor.author
Hartenstein, Alexander
dc.contributor.author
Rogasch, Julian Manuel Michael
dc.contributor.author
Furth, Christian
dc.contributor.author
Amthauer, Holger
dc.contributor.author
Hamm, Bernd
dc.contributor.author
Makowski, Marcus
dc.contributor.author
Penzkofer, Tobias
dc.date.accessioned
2023-12-07T14:57:52Z
dc.date.available
2023-12-07T14:57:52Z
dc.identifier.uri
https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/41833
dc.identifier.uri
http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/refubium-41553
dc.description.abstract
Background: We evaluated the role of radiomics applied to contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) in the detection of lymph node (LN) metastases in patients with known lung cancer compared to 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (PET)/CT as a reference.
Methods: This retrospective analysis included 381 patients with 1,799 lymph nodes (450 malignant, 1,349 negative). The data set was divided into a training and validation set. A radiomics analysis with 4 filters and 6 algorithms resulting in 24 different radiomics signatures and a bootstrap algorithm (Bagging) with 30 bootstrap iterations was performed. A decision curve analysis was applied to generate a net benefit to compare the radiomics signature to two expert radiologists as one-by-one and as a prescreening tool in combination with the respective radiologist and only the radiologists.
Results: All 24 modeling methods showed good and reliable discrimination for malignant/benign LNs (area under the curve 0.75-0.87). The decision curve analysis showed a net benefit for the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) classifier for the entire probability range and outperformed the expert radiologists except for the high probability range. Using the radiomics signature as a prescreening tool for the radiologists did not improve net benefit.
Conclusions: Radiomics showed good discrimination power irrespective of the modeling technique in detecting LN metastases in patients with known lung cancer. The LASSO classifier was a suitable diagnostic tool and even outperformed the expert radiologists, except for high probabilities. Radiomics failed to improve clinical benefit as a prescreening tool.
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject
Lung neoplasms
en
dc.subject
Lymphatic metastasis
en
dc.subject
Machine learning
en
dc.subject
Tomography (x-ray computed)
en
dc.subject.ddc
600 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften::610 Medizin und Gesundheit::610 Medizin und Gesundheit
dc.title
Inferring FDG-PET-positivity of lymph node metastases in proven lung cancer from contrast-enhanced CT using radiomics and machine learning
dc.type
Wissenschaftlicher Artikel
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.articlenumber
44
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.doi
10.1186/s41747-022-00296-8
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.journaltitle
European Radiology Experimental
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.number
1
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.originalpublishername
Springer Nature
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.volume
6
refubium.affiliation
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
refubium.funding
Springer Nature DEAL
refubium.resourceType.isindependentpub
no
dcterms.accessRights.openaire
open access
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pmid
36104467
dcterms.isPartOf.eissn
2509-9280