dc.contributor.author
Reznik, Nomi
dc.contributor.author
Krumm, Stefan
dc.contributor.author
Freudenstein, Jan-Philipp
dc.contributor.author
Heimann, Anna L.
dc.contributor.author
Ingold, Pia
dc.contributor.author
Schäpers, Philipp
dc.contributor.author
Kleinmann, Martin
dc.date.accessioned
2024-05-30T06:58:35Z
dc.date.available
2024-05-30T06:58:35Z
dc.identifier.uri
https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/41693
dc.identifier.uri
http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/refubium-41413
dc.description.abstract
Situational judgment tests (SJTs) are low-fidelity simulations that are often used in personnel selection. Previous research has provided evidence that the ability to identify criteria (ATIC)—individuals' capability to detect underlying constructs in nontransparent personnel selection procedures—is relevant in simulations in personnel selection, such as assessment centers and situational interviews. Building on recent theorizing about response processes in SJTs as well as on previous empirical results, we posit that ATIC predicts SJT performance. We tested this hypothesis across two preregistered studies. In Study 1, a between-subjects planned-missingness design (N = 391 panelists) was employed and 55 selected items from five different SJTs were administered. Mixed-effects-modeling revealed a small effect for ATIC in predicting SJT responses. Results were replicated in Study 2 (N = 491 panelists), in which a complete teamwork SJT was administered with a high- or a low-stakes instruction and showed either no or a small correlation with ATIC, respectively. We compare these findings with other studies, discuss implications for our understanding of response processes in SJTs, and derive avenues for future research.
en
dc.format.extent
15 Seiten
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.subject
ability to identify criteria
en
dc.subject
planned missingness
en
dc.subject
situational judgment test
en
dc.subject.ddc
100 Philosophie und Psychologie::150 Psychologie::150 Psychologie
dc.title
Does understanding what a test measures make a difference? On the relevance of the ability to identify criteria for situational judgment test performance
dc.type
Wissenschaftlicher Artikel
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.doi
10.1111/ijsa.12458
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.journaltitle
International Journal of Selection and Assessment
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.number
2
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pagestart
210
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pageend
224
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.volume
32
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.url
https://doi.org/10.1111/ijsa.12458
refubium.affiliation
Erziehungswissenschaft und Psychologie
refubium.affiliation.other
Arbeitsbereich Psychologische Diagnostik, Differentielle und Persönlichkeitspsychologie
refubium.funding
DEAL Wiley
refubium.note.author
Die Publikation wurde aus Open Access Publikationsgeldern der Freien Universität Berlin gefördert.
refubium.resourceType.isindependentpub
no
dcterms.accessRights.openaire
open access
dcterms.isPartOf.eissn
1468-2389