dc.contributor.author
Schlunk, Frieder
dc.contributor.author
Kuthe, Johannes
dc.contributor.author
Harmel, Peter
dc.contributor.author
Audebert, Heinrich
dc.contributor.author
Hanning, Uta
dc.contributor.author
Bohner, Georg
dc.contributor.author
Scheel, Michael
dc.contributor.author
Kleine, Justus
dc.contributor.author
Nawabi, Jawed
dc.date.accessioned
2023-11-28T13:52:28Z
dc.date.available
2023-11-28T13:52:28Z
dc.identifier.uri
https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/41636
dc.identifier.uri
http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/refubium-41356
dc.description.abstract
Background: Follow-up imaging in intracerebral hemorrhage is not standardized and radiologists rely on different imaging modalities to determine hematoma growth. This study assesses the volumetric accuracy of different imaging modalities (MRI, CT angiography, postcontrast CT) to measure hematoma size.
Methods: 28 patients with acute spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage referred to a tertiary stroke center were retrospectively included between 2018 and 2019. Inclusion criteria were (1) spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (supra- or infratentorial), (2) noncontrast CT imaging performed on admission, (3) follow-up imaging (CT angiography, postcontrast CT, MRI), and (4) absence of hematoma expansion confirmed by a third cranial image within 6 days. Two independent raters manually measured hematoma volume by drawing a region of interest on axial slices of admission noncontrast CT scans as well as on follow-up imaging (CT angiography, postcontrast CT, MRI) using a semi-automated segmentation tool (Visage image viewer; version 7.1.10). Results were compared using Bland-Altman plots.
Results: Mean admission hematoma volume was 18.79 +/- 19.86 cc. All interrater and intrarater intraclass correlation coefficients were excellent (1; IQR 0.98-1.00). In comparison to hematoma volume on admission noncontrast CT volumetric measurements were most accurate in patients who received postcontrast CT (bias of - 2.47%, SD 4.67: n = 10), while CT angiography often underestimated hemorrhage volumes (bias of 31.91%, SD 45.54; n = 20). In MRI sequences intracerebral hemorrhage volumes were overestimated in T2* (bias of - 64.37%, SD 21.65; n = 10). FLAIR (bias of 6.05%, SD 35.45; n = 13) and DWI (bias of-14.6%, SD 31.93; n = 12) over- and underestimated hemorrhagic volumes.
Conclusions: Volumetric measurements were most accurate in postcontrast CT while CT angiography and MRI sequences often substantially over- or underestimated hemorrhage volumes.
en
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject
Acute stroke
en
dc.subject
Intracerebral hemorrhage
en
dc.subject
Neurocritical care
en
dc.subject
Neuroradiology
en
dc.subject.ddc
600 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften::610 Medizin und Gesundheit::610 Medizin und Gesundheit
dc.title
Volumetric accuracy of different imaging modalities in acute intracerebral hemorrhage
dc.type
Wissenschaftlicher Artikel
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.articlenumber
9
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.doi
10.1186/s12880-022-00735-3
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.journaltitle
BMC Medical Imaging
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.number
1
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.originalpublishername
Springer Nature
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.volume
22
refubium.affiliation
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
refubium.funding
Springer Nature DEAL
refubium.resourceType.isindependentpub
no
dcterms.accessRights.openaire
open access
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pmid
35033012
dcterms.isPartOf.eissn
1471-2342