dc.contributor.author
Braicu, Elena Ioana
dc.contributor.author
Krause, Catherine Linn
dc.contributor.author
Torsten, Uwe
dc.contributor.author
Mecke, Herbert
dc.contributor.author
Richter, Rolf
dc.contributor.author
Hellmeyer, Lars
dc.contributor.author
Lanowska, Malgorzata
dc.contributor.author
Müller, Bodo
dc.contributor.author
Koch, Elisa
dc.contributor.author
Boenneß-Zaloum, Janine
dc.contributor.author
Ames, Kerstin
dc.contributor.author
Chekerov, Radoslav
dc.contributor.author
Hasenbein, Kati
dc.contributor.author
Zimmermann, Mathias
dc.contributor.author
Mangler, Mandy
dc.contributor.author
Chen, Frank
dc.contributor.author
Tauber, Rudolf
dc.contributor.author
Sehouli, Jalid
dc.date.accessioned
2023-11-16T12:34:56Z
dc.date.available
2023-11-16T12:34:56Z
dc.identifier.uri
https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/41566
dc.identifier.uri
http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/refubium-41285
dc.description.abstract
Background: To evaluate the diagnostic value of adding human epididymis protein 4 (HE4), cancer antigen 125 (CA125) and risk of malignancy algorithm (ROMA) to ultrasound for detecting ovarian cancer in patients with a pelvic mass.
Methods: This was a prospective, observational, multicenter study. Patients aged > 18 years who were scheduled to undergo surgery for a suspicious pelvic mass had CA125 and HE4 levels measured prior to surgery, in addition to a routine transvaginal ultrasound scan. The diagnostic performance of CA125, HE4 and ROMA for distinguishing between benign and malignant adnexal masses was assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis and the corresponding area under the curve (AUC).
Results: Of 965 evaluable patients, 804 were diagnosed with benign tumors and 161 were diagnosed with ovarian cancer. In late-stage ovarian cancer, CA125, HE4 and ROMA all had an excellent diagnostic performance (AUC > 0.92), whereas in stage I and II, diagnostic performance of all three biomarkers was less adequate (AUC < 0.77). In the differential diagnosis of ovarian cancer and endometriosis, ROMA and HE4 performed better than CA125 with 99 and 98.1% versus 75.0% sensitivity, respectively, at 75.4% specificity.
Conclusions: ROMA and HE4 could be valuable biomarkers to help with the diagnosis of ovarian cancer in premenopausal patients in order to differentiate from endometriosis, whereas CA125 may be more adequate for postmenopausal patients.
en
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject
Ovarian cancer
en
dc.subject
Endometriosis
en
dc.subject.ddc
600 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften::610 Medizin und Gesundheit::610 Medizin und Gesundheit
dc.title
HE4 as a serum biomarker for the diagnosis of pelvic masses: a prospective, multicenter study in 965 patients
dc.type
Wissenschaftlicher Artikel
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.articlenumber
831
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.doi
10.1186/s12885-022-09887-5
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.journaltitle
BMC Cancer
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.number
1
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.originalpublishername
Springer Nature
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.volume
22
refubium.affiliation
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
refubium.funding
Springer Nature DEAL
refubium.resourceType.isindependentpub
no
dcterms.accessRights.openaire
open access
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pmid
35907794
dcterms.isPartOf.eissn
1471-2407