dc.contributor.author
Schöfer, Till
dc.date.accessioned
2023-11-24T08:09:23Z
dc.date.available
2023-11-24T08:09:23Z
dc.identifier.uri
https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/40900
dc.identifier.uri
http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/refubium-40621
dc.description.abstract
Brazil has changed its negotiation strategy in World Trade Organization (WTO) negotiations. In the first half of the WTO era (1995–), Brazil adopted a strong developing country leadership role as coordinator and spokesperson of the G20 group of developing countries. More recently, however, this group has disappeared from the negotiation scene. This article examines how Brazil has departed from a 2000 status quo and arrived at a more flexible approach, less reliant on the industrialized-developing divide as a structuring principle of its diplomacy. Using WTO negotiation documents, trade delegate interviews, dispute settlement case law, and secondary literature, I outline the contours of new directions in Brazilian trade policy. These include joint legislative initiatives with the EU, a move towards the plurilateral level on non-traditional issues, a greater heterogeneity of dispute settlement targets, and a newly flexible handling of its rights under the WTO's special and differential treatment status. The article contributes to ongoing debates on Brazil's status in international affairs, its reliance on large coalitions, and the maintenance of followership as key directives of its foreign policy, and scholarship that sees Brazil as stuck in a ‘graduation dilemma’.
en
dc.format.extent
28 Seiten
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject
developing countries
en
dc.subject
emerging economies
en
dc.subject.ddc
300 Sozialwissenschaften::330 Wirtschaft::330 Wirtschaft
dc.title
From Developing Country Leader to Flexible Negotiator: New Directions in Brazilian Trade Strategy
dc.type
Wissenschaftlicher Artikel
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.doi
10.1017/S1474745623000319
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.journaltitle
World Trade Review
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.number
5
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pagestart
629
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pageend
656
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.volume
22
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.url
https://doi.org/10.1017/S1474745623000319
refubium.affiliation
Geschichts- und Kulturwissenschaften
refubium.affiliation.other
Ostasiatisches Seminar / Sinologie – Chinastudien
refubium.funding
Cambridge
refubium.note.author
Die Publikation wurde aus Open Access Publikationsgeldern der Freien Universität Berlin gefördert.
refubium.resourceType.isindependentpub
no
dcterms.accessRights.openaire
open access
dcterms.isPartOf.eissn
1475-3138