dc.contributor.author
Michallek, Florian
dc.contributor.author
Huisman, Henkjan
dc.contributor.author
Hamm, Bernd
dc.contributor.author
Elezkurtaj, Sefer
dc.contributor.author
Maxeiner, Andreas
dc.contributor.author
Dewey, Marc
dc.date.accessioned
2023-08-21T11:15:43Z
dc.date.available
2023-08-21T11:15:43Z
dc.identifier.uri
https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/40560
dc.identifier.uri
http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/refubium-40280
dc.description.abstract
Objectives: Multiparametric MRI has high diagnostic accuracy for detecting prostate cancer, but non-invasive prediction of tumor grade remains challenging. Characterizing tumor perfusion by exploiting the fractal nature of vascular anatomy might elucidate the aggressive potential of a tumor. This study introduces the concept of fractal analysis for characterizing prostate cancer perfusion and reports about its usefulness for non-invasive prediction of tumor grade.
Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the openly available PROSTATEx dataset with 112 cancer foci in 99 patients. In all patients, histological grading groups specified by the International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) were obtained from in-bore MRI-guided biopsy. Fractal analysis of dynamic contrast-enhanced perfusion MRI sequences was performed, yielding fractal dimension (FD) as quantitative descriptor. Two-class and multiclass diagnostic accuracy was analyzed using area under the curve (AUC) receiver operating characteristic analysis, and optimal FD cutoffs were established. Additionally, we compared fractal analysis to conventional apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) measurements.
Results: Fractal analysis of perfusion allowed accurate differentiation of non-significant (group 1) and clinically significant (groups 2-5) cancer with a sensitivity of 91% (confidence interval [CI]: 83-96%) and a specificity of 86% (CI: 73-94%). FD correlated linearly with ISUP groups (r(2) =0.874, p < 0.001). Significant groupwise differences were obtained between low, intermediate, and high ISUP group 1-4 (p <= 0.001) but not group 5 tumors. Fractal analysis of perfusion was significantly more reliable than ADC in predicting non-significant and clinically significant cancer (AUC(FD) =0.97 versus AUC(ADC) = 0.77, p < 0.001).
Conclusion: Fractal analysis of perfusion MRI accurately predicts prostate cancer grading in low-, intermediate-, and high-, but not highest-grade, tumors.
en
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject
Prostatic neoplasms
en
dc.subject
Neoplasm grading
en
dc.subject
Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging
en
dc.subject.ddc
600 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften::610 Medizin und Gesundheit::610 Medizin und Gesundheit
dc.title
Prediction of prostate cancer grade using fractal analysis of perfusion MRI: retrospective proof-of-principle study
dc.type
Wissenschaftlicher Artikel
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.doi
10.1007/s00330-021-08394-8
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.journaltitle
European Radiology
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.number
5
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.originalpublishername
Springer Nature
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pagestart
3236
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pageend
3247
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.volume
32
refubium.affiliation
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
refubium.funding
Springer Nature DEAL
refubium.resourceType.isindependentpub
no
dcterms.accessRights.openaire
open access
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pmid
34913991
dcterms.isPartOf.eissn
1432-1084