dc.contributor.author
Seemann, Ricarda J.
dc.contributor.author
Melcher, P.
dc.contributor.author
Eder, Christian
dc.contributor.author
Deckena, Joscha
dc.contributor.author
Kasch, R.
dc.contributor.author
Fröhlich, S.
dc.contributor.author
März, M.
dc.contributor.author
Ghanem, M.
dc.contributor.author
AG Lehre DGOU
dc.date.accessioned
2023-08-18T11:43:32Z
dc.date.available
2023-08-18T11:43:32Z
dc.identifier.uri
https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/40530
dc.identifier.uri
http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/refubium-40250
dc.description.abstract
Background: Obtaining informed consent is a challenging task and is part of the educational objectives in the German NKLM. Teaching formats are inconsistent and time-consuming, with little emphasis on legal aspects, although they have moved into the focus of attention since the implementation of patient rights laws and play an important role in legal proceedings.
Objectives: The aim of this study was the evaluation of medical students' knowledge about the legal aspects of obtaining informed consent. A legal analysis was performed, and the patient rights laws were reviewed with reference to implications for undergraduate medical education.
Materials and methods: After the analysis of laws and jurisdiction, multiple-choice questions regarding the legal aspects of obtaining informed consent were created and placed in the Progress Test Medicine (PTM). A statistical analysis of the results of Berlin medical students was performed descriptively.
Results: The answers of 2625 (winter semester 2018/19) and 2409 (summer semester 2019) medical students in Berlin were analyzed. The rate of students who answered the questions about the procedures requiring informed consent and adequate time for consideration increased over time but did not reach comparable values to all PTM questions. Questions about required content were answered correctly by 30 to 60% of the students, regardless of their level of training; we did not see an increase along with the time of study.
Conclusion: In our study, we were able to show that medical students of all educational levels show tentativeness when it comes to the legal aspects of obtaining informed consent. Yet, the legal framework offers room for new teaching formats like "Co-Action", introduced in this paper for the first time, where students acquire informed consent while being supervised by the medical doctor in charge.
en
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject
Informed consent
en
dc.subject
Medical jurisprudence
en
dc.subject
Professional delegation
en
dc.subject
Undergraduate medical education
en
dc.subject
Aufklärungsgespräch
de
dc.subject
Medizinrecht
de
dc.subject
Berufliche Delegation
de
dc.subject
Medizinstudium
de
dc.subject.ddc
600 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften::610 Medizin und Gesundheit::610 Medizin und Gesundheit
dc.title
Chirurgische Aufklärung: Klar geregelt durch das Patientenrechtegesetz – deutliche Unsicherheit bei Medizinstudierenden
dc.type
Wissenschaftlicher Artikel
dc.title.subtitle
Rechtsanalyse und Bestandsaufnahme bei über 2500 Berliner Medizinstudierenden im Rahmen des Progress Test Medizin
dc.title.translated
Informed consent for surgery: clearly regulated by the patient rights law—significant uncertainty amongmedical students. Legal analysis and inventory of over 2500 medical students in Berlin as part of the Progress Test Medicine
en
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.doi
10.1007/s00132-021-04080-1
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.journaltitle
Der Orthopäde
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.number
11
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.originalpublishername
Springer Nature
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pagestart
937
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pageend
945
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.volume
50
refubium.affiliation
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
refubium.funding
Springer Nature DEAL
refubium.resourceType.isindependentpub
no
dcterms.accessRights.openaire
open access
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pmid
33666674
dcterms.isPartOf.issn
0085-4530
dcterms.isPartOf.eissn
1433-0431