dc.contributor.author
Conzelmann, Juliane
dc.contributor.author
Genske, Ulrich
dc.contributor.author
Emig, Arthur
dc.contributor.author
Scheel, Michael
dc.contributor.author
Hamm, Bernd
dc.contributor.author
Jahnke, Paul
dc.date.accessioned
2023-07-12T08:10:19Z
dc.date.available
2023-07-12T08:10:19Z
dc.identifier.uri
https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/40053
dc.identifier.uri
http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/refubium-39775
dc.description.abstract
Objectives: To evaluate the effects of anatomical phantom structure on task-based image quality assessment compared with a uniform phantom background.
Methods: Two neck phantom types of identical shape were investigated: a uniform type containing 10-mm lesions with 4, 9, 18, 30, and 38 HU contrast to the surrounding area and an anatomically realistic type containing lesions of the same size and location with 10, 18, 30, and 38 HU contrast. Phantom images were acquired at two dose levels (CTDIvol of 1.4 and 5.6 mGy) and reconstructed using filtered back projection (FBP) and adaptive iterative dose reduction 3D (AIDR 3D). Detection accuracy was evaluated by seven radiologists in a 4-alternative forced choice experiment.
Results: Anatomical phantom structure impaired lesion detection at all lesion contrasts (p < 0.01). Detectability in the anatomical phantom at 30 HU contrast was similar to 9 HU contrast in uniform images (91.1% vs. 89.5%). Detection accuracy decreased from 83.6% at 5.6 mGy to 55.4% at 1.4 mGy in uniform FBP images (p < 0.001), whereas AIDR 3D preserved detectability at 1.4 mGy (80.7% vs. 85% at 5.6 mGy, p = 0.375) and was superior to FBP (p < 0.001). In the assessment of anatomical images, superiority of AIDR 3D was not confirmed and dose reduction moderately affected detectability (74.6% vs. 68.2%, p = 0.027 for FBP and 81.1% vs. 73%, p = 0.018 for AIDR 3D).
Conclusions: A lesion contrast increase from 9 to 30 HU is necessary for similar detectability in anatomical and uniform neck phantom images. Anatomical phantom structure influences task-based assessment of iterative reconstruction and dose effects.
en
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject
Tomography, X-ray computed
en
dc.subject
Phantoms, imaging
en
dc.subject
Medical physics
en
dc.subject
Radiation protection
en
dc.subject.ddc
600 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften::610 Medizin und Gesundheit::610 Medizin und Gesundheit
dc.title
Comparison of low-contrast detectability between uniform and anatomically realistic phantoms—influences on CT image quality assessment
dc.type
Wissenschaftlicher Artikel
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.doi
10.1007/s00330-021-08248-3
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.journaltitle
European Radiology
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.number
2
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.originalpublishername
Springer Nature
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pagestart
1267
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pageend
1275
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.volume
32
refubium.affiliation
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
refubium.funding
Springer Nature DEAL
refubium.resourceType.isindependentpub
no
dcterms.accessRights.openaire
open access
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pmid
34476563
dcterms.isPartOf.issn
0938-7994
dcterms.isPartOf.eissn
1432-1084