dc.contributor.author
Hofmann, Elena
dc.contributor.author
Preissner, Saskia
dc.contributor.author
Hertel, Moritz
dc.contributor.author
Preissner, Robert
dc.contributor.author
Rendenbach, Carsten
dc.contributor.author
Flörcken, Anne
dc.contributor.author
Heiland, Max
dc.date.accessioned
2023-05-11T13:00:52Z
dc.date.available
2023-05-11T13:00:52Z
dc.identifier.uri
https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/39316
dc.identifier.uri
http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/refubium-39035
dc.description.abstract
Background: The impact of adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the treatment of craniofacial bone sarcomas has not been clarified. This study aimed to assess whether survival outcomes differed between patients who underwent adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
Methods: A retrospective search for adult patients diagnosed with malignant neoplasms of the craniofacial bones (International Classification of Diseases 10 codes C41.0-C41.1), within the past 20 years from the access date 28 April 2022, was conducted using the TriNetX network (TriNetX, Cambridge, MA, USA). Cohort I included patients who underwent adjuvant chemotherapy and cohort II included patients with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. A refined search for individuals that received common chemotherapeutic agents, such as methotrexate, doxorubicin, cisplatin, and/or ifosfamide, was conducted and patients were assigned to cohort A (adjuvant chemotherapy) and cohort B (neoadjuvant chemotherapy). Following matching for age and sex, Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed, and risk ratio, odds ratio (OR), and hazard ratio were calculated.
Results: Patients were assigned to two cohorts, with 181 patients each after matching. In cohorts I and II, 55 and 41 patients died, respectively. No significant differences were found between the two cohorts regarding the 5-year survival probability (I: 59.87% versus II: 68.45%; p = 0.076; log-rank test), or the risk of dying (I: 0.304 versus II: 0.227; risk difference: 0.077; p = 0.096). The risk analysis before matching for age and sex showed a significant survival benefit in cohort II (OR: 1.586; p = 0.0295; risk difference: 0.093). After a refined query to identify patients treated with methotrexate, doxorubicin, cisplatin, and/or ifosfamide, the two cohorts included 47 patients, respectively. In cohort A (adjuvant chemotherapy), 19 patients died, whereas 12 patients died in cohort B (neoadjuvant chemotherapy) within 5 years after diagnosis. Further analysis indicated a greater survival in cohort B, but the survival probability between the cohorts did not differ significantly (A: 43.55% versus B: 54.49%; p = 0.171).
Conclusion: The use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy may improve survival rates in patients with surgically treated craniofacial bone sarcomas. Due to the retrospective nature of this study, randomized controlled studies are required to derive treatment recommendations.
en
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
dc.subject
adjuvant chemotherapy
en
dc.subject
chondrosarcoma
en
dc.subject
craniofacial bone sarcoma
en
dc.subject
head and neck cancer
en
dc.subject
neoadjuvant chemotherapy
en
dc.subject
osteosarcoma
en
dc.subject
real-world data
en
dc.subject.ddc
600 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften::610 Medizin und Gesundheit::610 Medizin und Gesundheit
dc.title
A retrospective case–control study for the comparison of 5-year survival rates: the role of adjuvant and neoadjuvant chemotherapy in craniofacial bone sarcoma in adults
dc.type
Wissenschaftlicher Artikel
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.articlenumber
17588359221148023
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.doi
10.1177/17588359221148023
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.journaltitle
Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.originalpublishername
SAGE Publications
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.volume
15
refubium.affiliation
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
refubium.resourceType.isindependentpub
no
dcterms.accessRights.openaire
open access
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pmid
36818689
dcterms.isPartOf.eissn
1758-8359