dc.contributor.author
Bruder, Leon
dc.contributor.author
Schawe, Larissa
dc.contributor.author
Gebauer, Bernhard
dc.contributor.author
Frese, Jan Paul
dc.contributor.author
Bucourt, Maximilian de
dc.contributor.author
Beyer, Katharina
dc.contributor.author
Pratschke, Johann
dc.contributor.author
Greiner, Andreas
dc.contributor.author
Omran, Safwan
dc.date.accessioned
2023-03-21T16:31:03Z
dc.date.available
2023-03-21T16:31:03Z
dc.identifier.uri
https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/38498
dc.identifier.uri
http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/refubium-38216
dc.description.abstract
Purpose: To report and compare the results of endovascular and open surgical treatment for erosion bleeding of visceral arteries following pancreatitis and pancreatic surgery.
Materials and Methods: This retrospective study included 65 consecutive patients (46 males, mean age 63 +/- 14 years) presenting with visceral artery erosions between January 2011 and December 2020. Endpoints were technical success, freedom from reintervention, stent-graft-related complications, and 30-day and one-year mortality.
Results: The causes of erosion bleeding included complications of surgical treatment for the pancreas and upper gastrointestinal tract (75%), pancreatitis (19%), and spontaneous bleeding (6%). Pancreatectomy was performed in 34 (52%) patients, representing 2% of all pancreatectomy procedures (n = 1645) performed in our hospital during the study period. A total of 37 (57%) patients underwent endovascular treatment (EVT), and 28 (43%) patients had open surgery (OS) as a primary treatment. Eight of 37 (22%) patients in the EVT group underwent stent-graft treatment of the eroded vessels and 28 (78%) coil embolization. Six (9%) patients underwent reintervention with no significant differences between EVT and OS groups (11% vs. 7%, p = 0.692). Postoperative morbidity and complications in 52% of all patients were higher in the OS group than in the EVT group (41% vs. 68%, p = 0.029). The in-hospital 30-days mortality rate for all patients was 25%, and it was higher in the OS group than in the EVT group (14% vs. 39%, p = 0.017).
Conclusions: An endovascular-first strategy for treating visceral arteries erosions may be preferred to reduce the complications associated with open surgery if patients are hemodynamically stable and have no anastomotic insufficiency. Endovascular treatment may be associated with better in-hospital survival when compared to primary open surgery. Further studies are required to identify the optimal approach.
en
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject
visceral artery erosion
en
dc.subject
pancreatectomy
en
dc.subject
pancreatitis
en
dc.subject
extraluminal hemorrhage
en
dc.subject
coil embolization
en
dc.subject.ddc
600 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften::610 Medizin und Gesundheit::610 Medizin und Gesundheit
dc.title
Evaluation of Open Surgical and Endovascular Treatment Options for Visceral Artery Erosions after Pancreatitis and Pancreatic Surgery
dc.type
Wissenschaftlicher Artikel
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.doi
10.3390/curroncol29040201
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.journaltitle
Current Oncology
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.number
4
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.originalpublishername
MDPI AG
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pagestart
2472
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pageend
2482
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.volume
29
refubium.affiliation
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
refubium.resourceType.isindependentpub
no
dcterms.accessRights.openaire
open access
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pmid
35448175
dcterms.isPartOf.eissn
1718-7729