dc.contributor.author
Dimitrova, Desislava
dc.contributor.author
Naghavi, Baharan
dc.contributor.author
Richter, R.
dc.contributor.author
Nasser, Sara
dc.contributor.author
Chekerov, Radoslav
dc.contributor.author
Braicu, Elena I.
dc.contributor.author
David, Matthias
dc.contributor.author
Blohmer, Jens-Uwe
dc.contributor.author
Inci, Gülhan
dc.contributor.author
Torsten, U.
dc.contributor.author
Oskay-Özcelik, G.
dc.contributor.author
Blau, I.
dc.contributor.author
Fersis, N.
dc.contributor.author
Holzgreve, A.
dc.contributor.author
Keil, E.
dc.contributor.author
Keller, M.
dc.contributor.author
Keilholz, Ulrich
dc.contributor.author
Sehouli, Jalid
dc.date.accessioned
2023-03-17T14:35:54Z
dc.date.available
2023-03-17T14:35:54Z
dc.identifier.uri
https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/38445
dc.identifier.uri
http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/refubium-38163
dc.description.abstract
Background: An effective cross-cultural doctor-patient communication is vital for health literacy and patient compliance. Building a good relationship with medical staff is also relevant for the treatment decision-making process for cancer patients. Studies about the role of a specific migrant background regarding patient preferences and expectations are lacking. We therefore conducted a multicentre prospective survey to explore the needs and preferences of patients with a migrant background (PMB) suffering from gynecological malignancies and breast cancer to evaluate the quality of doctor-patient communication and cancer management compared to non-migrants (NM).
Methods: This multicentre survey recruited patients with primary or recurrence of breast, ovarian, peritoneal, or fallopian tube cancer. The patients either filled out a paper form, participated via an online survey, or were interviewed by trained staff. A 58-item questionnaire was primarily developed in German and then translated into three different languages to reach non-German-speaking patients.
Results: A total of 606 patients were included in the study: 54.1% (328) were interviewed directly, 9.1% (55) participated via an online survey, and 36.8% (223) used the paper print version. More than one quarter, 27.4% (166) of the participants, had a migrant background. The majority of migrants and NM were highly satisfied with the communication with their doctors. First-generation migrants (FGM) and patients with breast cancer were less often informed about participation in clinical trials (p < 0.05) and 24.5% of them suggested the help of an interpreter to improve the medical consultation. Second and third-generation migrants (SGM and TGM) experienced more fatigue and nausea than expected.
Conclusions: Our results allow the hypothesis that training medical staff in intercultural competence and using disease-related patient information in different languages can improve best supportive care management and quality of life in cancer patients with migrant status.
en
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject
Doctor-patient relationship
en
dc.subject
Patient preference
en
dc.subject
Therapy expectations
en
dc.subject.ddc
600 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften::610 Medizin und Gesundheit::610 Medizin und Gesundheit
dc.title
Influence of migrant background on patient preference and expectations in breast and gynecological malignancies (NOGGO-expression V study): results of a prospective multicentre study in 606 patients in Germany
dc.type
Wissenschaftlicher Artikel
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.articlenumber
1018
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.doi
10.1186/s12885-021-08731-6
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.journaltitle
BMC Cancer
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.originalpublishername
Springer Nature
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.volume
21
refubium.affiliation
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
refubium.funding
Springer Nature DEAL
refubium.resourceType.isindependentpub
no
dcterms.accessRights.openaire
open access
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pmid
34511112
dcterms.isPartOf.eissn
1471-2407