dc.contributor.author
Lech, Sonia
dc.contributor.author
O’Sullivan, Julie L.
dc.contributor.author
Drewelies, Johanna
dc.contributor.author
Herrmann, Wolfram
dc.contributor.author
Spang, Robert P.
dc.contributor.author
Voigt-Antons, Jan-Niklas
dc.contributor.author
Nordheim, Johanna
dc.contributor.author
Gellert, Paul
dc.date.accessioned
2023-03-16T15:48:35Z
dc.date.available
2023-03-16T15:48:35Z
dc.identifier.uri
https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/38429
dc.identifier.uri
http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/refubium-38147
dc.description.abstract
Background: General practitioners (GPs) play a key role in the care of people with dementia (PwD). However, the role of the German Dementia Guideline in primary care remains unclear. The main objective of the present study was to examine the role of guideline-based dementia care in general practices.
Methods: A cross-sectional analysis of data obtained from the DemTab study was conducted. Descriptive analyses of sociodemographic and clinical characteristics for GPs (N = 28) and PwD (N = 91) were conducted. Adherence to the German Dementia Guideline of GPs was measured at the level of PwD. Linear Mixed Models were used to analyze the associations between adherence to the German Dementia Guideline and GP factors at individual (age, years of experience as a GP, frequency of utilization of guideline, perceived usefulness of guideline) and structural (type of practice, total number of patients seen by a participating GP, and total number of PwD seen by a participating GP) levels as well as between adherence to the German Dementia Guideline and PwD's quality of life.
Results: Self-reported overall adherence of GPs was on average 71% (SD = 19.4, range: 25-100). Adherence to specific recommendations varied widely (from 19.2 to 95.3%) and the majority of GPs (79.1%) reported the guideline as only partially or somewhat helpful. Further, we found lower adherence to be significantly associated with higher numbers of patients (gamma 10 = - 5.58, CI = - 10.97, - 0.19, p = .04). No association between adherence to the guideline and PwD's quality of life was found (gamma 10 = -.86, CI = - 4.18, 2.47, p = .61).
Conclusion: The present study examined the role of adherence to the German Dementia Guideline recommendations in primary care. Overall, GPs reported high levels of adherence. However, major differences across guideline recommendations were found. Findings highlight the importance of guidelines for the provision of care. Dementia guidelines for GPs need to be better tailored and addressed. Further, structural changes such as more time for PwD may contribute to a sustainable change of dementia care in primary care.
en
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject
Primary care
en
dc.subject
Adherence to dementia guideline
en
dc.subject.ddc
600 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften::610 Medizin und Gesundheit::610 Medizin und Gesundheit
dc.title
Dementia care and the role of guideline adherence in primary care: cross-sectional findings from the DemTab study
dc.type
Wissenschaftlicher Artikel
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.articlenumber
717
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.doi
10.1186/s12877-021-02650-8
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.journaltitle
BMC Geriatrics
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.originalpublishername
Springer Nature
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.volume
21
refubium.affiliation
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
refubium.funding
Springer Nature DEAL
refubium.resourceType.isindependentpub
no
dcterms.accessRights.openaire
open access
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pmid
34922486
dcterms.isPartOf.eissn
1471-2318