dc.contributor.author
Kamali, Can
dc.contributor.author
Kamali, Kaan
dc.contributor.author
Brunnbauer, Philipp
dc.contributor.author
Splith, Katrin
dc.contributor.author
Pratschke, Johann
dc.contributor.author
Schmelzle, Moritz
dc.contributor.author
Krenzien, Felix
dc.date.accessioned
2023-03-13T16:28:39Z
dc.date.available
2023-03-13T16:28:39Z
dc.identifier.uri
https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/38349
dc.identifier.uri
http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/refubium-38068
dc.description.abstract
Background: Rodent models of liver resection have been used to investigate and evaluate the liver's complex physiology and pathology since 1931. First documented by Higgins and Anderson, such models were created to understand liver regeneration mechanisms to improve outcomes in patients undergoing extensive liver resection for liver cancer or other underlying liver diseases.
Methods: A systematic search was conducted using Pubmed, gathering publications up to January 2019, which engaged with the mouse model of extended liver resection as a method itself. The results of this search were filtered according to their language, novelty, and relevancy.
Results: The Boolean search found 3741 articles on Pubmed, with 3130 publications remaining when filtered by language and the presence of a full text. In total, 21 of these publications examined the key themes of the animal model described. The mortality varied from 0 to 50% depending on the surgeon's experience and the resection method. The liver resection was mainly performed with classic sutures (14 out of 21 publications) and isoflurane was used for anaesthesia (10 out of 21 publications) in combination with analgesics (buprenorphine or ketamine/xylazine). The most used mouse strain was C57BL/6 (7 of 21 publications) which was on average 11 weeks old with a weight of 23 g.
Conclusion: Through the overview, laid out in the selected publications, this paper reviews the shift of the extended liver resection model from rat to the mouse, describes the state of the art in the experimental setting, and discusses the possible limitations and pitfalls. Clearly, the extended liver resection in mice is a reproducible, practical and easy to learn method.
en
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject
Liver regeneration
en
dc.subject
Animal experimentation
en
dc.subject
Liver resection
en
dc.subject
Suture ligation
en
dc.subject
Hemostatic clip
en
dc.subject.ddc
600 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften::610 Medizin und Gesundheit::610 Medizin und Gesundheit
dc.title
Extended liver resection in mice: state of the art and pitfalls—a systematic review
dc.type
Wissenschaftlicher Artikel
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.articlenumber
6
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.doi
10.1186/s40001-020-00478-3
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.journaltitle
European Journal of Medical Research
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.originalpublishername
Springer Nature
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.volume
26
refubium.affiliation
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
refubium.funding
Springer Nature DEAL
refubium.resourceType.isindependentpub
no
dcterms.accessRights.openaire
open access
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pmid
33422147
dcterms.isPartOf.eissn
2047-783X