dc.contributor.author
König, Anika
dc.contributor.author
Whittaker, Andrea
dc.contributor.author
Gerrits, Trudie
dc.contributor.author
Rozée, Virginie
dc.date.accessioned
2022-11-21T14:07:28Z
dc.date.available
2022-11-21T14:07:28Z
dc.identifier.uri
https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/36967
dc.identifier.uri
http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/refubium-36680
dc.description.abstract
Gestational surrogacy is a reproductive arrangement where a woman gestates a child for others—the “intended parents”—in order to be handed over to them after birth. Since the turn of the millennium, demands for surrogacy have continuously increased due to social and demographic changes, rising rates of infertility, and the normalization of new, non-heteronormative, family forms. Many countries prohibit surrogacy, and others that previously permitted this reproductive arrangement closed down as a result of political decisions or surrogacy scandals. Moreover, surrogacy is offered at greatly varying costs, ranging from approximately US$50,000 in countries like the Republic of Georgia to US$200,000 in fertility clinics in California. Accordingly, many of these arrangements are transnational, with intended parents who cannot access surrogacy or afford surrogacy in their home country commissioning it in countries such as the United States, until recently Ukraine, and today increasingly in the Republic of Georgia. Existing research has focused on surrogacy from different angles, such as practices of kinning and de-kinning, inequality and stratification, the political economy of the fertility industry, and its gender dimensions. We engage in, but further these debates by drawing attention to settings, accounts, experiences, and new theoretical notions that diverge from “mainstream” presentations of surrogacy. Moreover, in this Special Issue, we experimented with writing joint papers with a deliberative aim to provide comparative analyses and emphasize the links between and diversity of different cases of surrogacy. Therefore, all papers have an explicit comparative character and are all based on empirical studies from more than one field site. They provide nuanced understandings of surrogacy arrangements, grounded in empirical data rather than ideological, political, or moral assessments.
en
dc.format.extent
12 Seiten
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
dc.subject
Fertility industry
en
dc.subject
global fertility market
en
dc.subject
reproductive technologies
en
dc.subject
third-party reproduction
en
dc.subject
transnational surrogacy
en
dc.subject.ddc
300 Sozialwissenschaften::300 Sozialwissenschaften, Soziologie::301 Soziologie, Anthropologie
dc.title
Shifting surrogacies: Comparative ethnographies
dc.type
Wissenschaftlicher Artikel
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.doi
10.1177/00207152221110088
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.journaltitle
International Journal of Comparative Sociology
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.number
5-6
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.originalpublishername
SAGE Publications
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.originalpublisherplace
Sage UK: London, England
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pagestart
235
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pageend
246
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.volume
63
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.url
https://doi.org/10.1177/00207152221110088
refubium.affiliation
Politik- und Sozialwissenschaften
refubium.affiliation.other
Institut für Sozial- und Kulturanthropologie
refubium.note.author
Die Publikation wurde aus Open Access Publikationsgeldern der Freien Universität Berlin gefördert.
refubium.resourceType.isindependentpub
no
dcterms.accessRights.openaire
open access
dcterms.isPartOf.issn
0020-7152
dcterms.isPartOf.eissn
1745-2554
refubium.resourceType.provider
DeepGreen