dc.contributor.author
Perski, Olga
dc.contributor.author
Keller, Jan
dc.contributor.author
Kale, Dimitra
dc.contributor.author
Asare, Bernard Yeboah-Asiamah
dc.contributor.author
Schneider, Verena
dc.contributor.author
Powell, Daniel
dc.contributor.author
Naughton, Felix
dc.contributor.author
ten Hoor, Gill
dc.contributor.author
Verboon, Peter
dc.contributor.author
Kwasnicka, Dominika
dc.date.accessioned
2022-11-30T13:01:17Z
dc.date.available
2022-11-30T13:01:17Z
dc.identifier.uri
https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/36858
dc.identifier.uri
http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/refubium-36571
dc.description.abstract
Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA) involves repeated, real-time sampling of health behaviours in context. We present the state-of-knowledge in EMA research focused on five key health behaviours (physical activity and sedentary behaviour, dietary behaviour, alcohol consumption, tobacco smoking, sexual health), summarising theoretical (e.g., psychological and contextual predictors) and methodological aspects (e.g., study characteristics, EMA adherence). We searched Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO and Web of Science until February 2021. We included studies focused on any of the aforementioned health behaviours in adult, non-clinical populations that assessed ≥1 psychological/contextual predictor and reported a predictor-behaviour association. A narrative synthesis and random-effects meta-analyses of EMA adherence were conducted. We included 633 studies. The median study duration was 14 days. The most frequently assessed predictors were ‘negative feeling states’ (21%) and ‘motivation and goals’ (16.5%). The pooled percentage of EMA adherence was high at 81.4% (95% CI = 80.0%, 82.8%, k = 348) and did not differ by target behaviour but was somewhat higher in student (vs. general population) samples, when EMAs were delivered via mobile phones/smartphones (vs. handheld devices), and when event contingent (vs. fixed) sampling was used. This review showcases how the EMA method has been applied to improve understanding and prediction of health behaviours in context.
en
dc.format.extent
26 Seiten
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject
Ambulatory assessment
en
dc.subject
ecological momentary assessment
en
dc.subject
experience sampling
en
dc.subject
health psychology
en
dc.subject
systematic review
en
dc.subject
meta-analysis
en
dc.subject.ddc
100 Philosophie und Psychologie::150 Psychologie::150 Psychologie
dc.title
Understanding health behaviours in context: A systematic review and meta-analysis of ecological momentary assessment studies of five key health behaviours
dc.type
Wissenschaftlicher Artikel
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.doi
10.1080/17437199.2022.2112258
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.journaltitle
Health Psychology Review
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.number
4
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pagestart
576
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pageend
601
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.volume
16
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.url
https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2022.2112258
refubium.affiliation
Erziehungswissenschaft und Psychologie
refubium.affiliation.other
Arbeitsbereich Gesundheitspsychologie

refubium.resourceType.isindependentpub
no
dcterms.accessRights.openaire
open access
dcterms.isPartOf.eissn
1743-7202
refubium.resourceType.provider
WoS-Alert