dc.contributor.author
Sousa‐Pinto, Bernardo
dc.contributor.author
Eklund, Patrik
dc.contributor.author
Pfaar, Oliver
dc.contributor.author
Klimek, Ludger
dc.contributor.author
Zuberbier, Torsten
dc.contributor.author
Czarlewski, Wienczyslawa
dc.contributor.author
Bédard, Annabelle
dc.contributor.author
Bindslev‐Jensen, Carsten
dc.contributor.author
Bedbrook, Anna
dc.contributor.author
Bosnic‐Anticevich, Sinthia
dc.contributor.author
Brussino, Luisa
dc.contributor.author
Cardona, Victoria
dc.contributor.author
Cruz, Alvaro A.
dc.contributor.author
Vries, Govert de
dc.contributor.author
Devillier, Philippe
dc.contributor.author
Fokkens, Wytske J.
dc.contributor.author
Fuentes‐Pérez, José Miguel
dc.contributor.author
Gemicioğlu, Bilun
dc.contributor.author
Haahtela, Tari
dc.contributor.author
Huerta‐Villalobos, Yunen Rocío
dc.contributor.author
Ivancevich, Juan Carlos
dc.contributor.author
Kull, Inger
dc.contributor.author
Kuna, Piotr
dc.contributor.author
Kvedariene, Violeta
dc.contributor.author
Larenas Linnemann, Désirée E.
dc.contributor.author
Laune, Daniel
dc.contributor.author
Makris, Michael
dc.contributor.author
Melén, Erik
dc.contributor.author
Morais‐Almeida, Mário
dc.contributor.author
Mösges, Ralph
dc.contributor.author
Mullol, Joaquim
dc.contributor.author
O'Hehir, Robyn E.
dc.contributor.author
Papadopoulos, Nikolaos G.
dc.contributor.author
Pereira, Ana Margarida
dc.contributor.author
Prokopakis, Emmanuel P.
dc.contributor.author
Psarros, Fotis
dc.contributor.author
Regateiro, Frederico S.
dc.contributor.author
Reitsma, Sietze
dc.contributor.author
Samolinski, Boleslaw
dc.contributor.author
Scichilone, Nicola
dc.contributor.author
Silva, Jane da
dc.contributor.author
Stellato, Cristiana
dc.contributor.author
Todo‐Bom, Ana
dc.contributor.author
Tomazic, Peter Valentin
dc.contributor.author
Salmi, Sanna Toppila
dc.contributor.author
Valero, Antonio
dc.contributor.author
Valiulis, Arunas
dc.contributor.author
Valovirta, Erkka
dc.contributor.author
Eerd, Michiel
dc.contributor.author
Ventura, Maria Teresa
dc.contributor.author
Yorgancioglu, Arzu
dc.contributor.author
Basagaña, Xavier
dc.contributor.author
Antó, Josep M.
dc.contributor.author
Bousquet, Jean
dc.contributor.author
Fonseca, João Almeida
dc.date.accessioned
2022-11-09T07:38:27Z
dc.date.available
2022-11-09T07:38:27Z
dc.identifier.uri
https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/36765
dc.identifier.uri
http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/refubium-36478
dc.description.abstract
Background: MASK-air® is an app that supports allergic rhinitis patients in disease control. Users register daily allergy symptoms and their impact on activities using visual analog scales (VASs). We aimed to assess the concurrent validity, reliability, and responsiveness of these daily VASs.
Methods: Daily monitoring VAS data were assessed in MASK-air® users with allergic rhinitis. Concurrent validity was assessed by correlating daily VAS values with those of the EuroQol-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) VAS, the Control of Allergic Rhinitis and Asthma Test (CARAT) score, and the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Allergic Specific (WPAI-AS) Questionnaire (work and activity impairment scores). Intra-rater reliability was assessed in users providing multiple daily VASs within the same day. Test–retest reliability was tested in clinically stable users, as defined by the EQ-5D VAS, CARAT, or “VAS Work” (i.e., VAS assessing the impact of allergy on work). Responsiveness was determined in users with two consecutive measurements of EQ-5D-VAS or “VAS Work” indicating clinical change.
Results: A total of 17,780 MASK-air® users, with 317,176 VAS days, were assessed. Concurrent validity was moderate–high (Spearman correlation coefficient range: 0.437–0.716). Intra-rater reliability intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) ranged between 0.870 (VAS assessing global allergy symptoms) and 0.937 (VAS assessing allergy symptoms on sleep). Test–retest reliability ICCs ranged between 0.604 and 0.878—“VAS Work” and “VAS asthma” presented the highest ICCs. Moderate/large responsiveness effect sizes were observed—the sleep VAS was associated with lower responsiveness, while the global allergy symptoms VAS demonstrated higher responsiveness.
Conclusion: In MASK-air®, daily monitoring VASs have high intra-rater reliability and moderate–high validity, reliability, and responsiveness, pointing to a reliable measure of symptom loads.
en
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject
allergic rhinitis
en
dc.subject
mobile health
en
dc.subject
responsiveness
en
dc.subject
visual analog scales
en
dc.subject.ddc
600 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften::610 Medizin und Gesundheit::610 Medizin und Gesundheit
dc.title
Validity, reliability, and responsiveness of daily monitoring visual analog scales in MASK‐air®
dc.type
Wissenschaftlicher Artikel
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.articlenumber
e12062
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.doi
10.1002/clt2.12062
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.journaltitle
Clinical and Translational Allergy
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.number
7
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.originalpublishername
Wiley
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.volume
11
refubium.affiliation
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
refubium.funding
DEAL Wiley
refubium.resourceType.isindependentpub
no
dcterms.accessRights.openaire
open access
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pmid
34567526
dcterms.isPartOf.eissn
2045-7022