dc.contributor.author
Beetz, Nick Lasse
dc.contributor.author
Maier, Christoph
dc.contributor.author
Segger, Laura
dc.contributor.author
Shnayien, Seyd
dc.contributor.author
Trippel, Tobias Daniel
dc.contributor.author
Lindow, Norbert
dc.contributor.author
Bousabarah, Khaled
dc.contributor.author
Westerhoff, Malte
dc.contributor.author
Fehrenbach, Uli
dc.contributor.author
Geisel, Dominik
dc.date.accessioned
2022-11-07T14:06:48Z
dc.date.available
2022-11-07T14:06:48Z
dc.identifier.uri
https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/36737
dc.identifier.uri
http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/refubium-36450
dc.description.abstract
Background: To externally evaluate the first picture archiving communications system (PACS)-integrated artificial intelligence (AI)-based workflow, trained to automatically detect a predefined computed tomography (CT) slice at the third lumbar vertebra (L3) and automatically perform complete image segmentation for analysis of CT body composition and to compare its performance with that of an established semi-automatic segmentation tool regarding speed and accuracy of tissue area calculation.
Methods: For fully automatic analysis of body composition with L3 recognition, U-Nets were trained (Visage) and compared with a conventional image segmentation software (TomoVision). Tissue was differentiated into psoas muscle, skeletal muscle, visceral adipose tissue (VAT) and subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT). Mid-L3 level images from randomly selected DICOM slice files of 20 CT scans acquired with various imaging protocols were segmented with both methods.
Results: Success rate of AI-based L3 recognition was 100%. Compared with semi-automatic, fully automatic AI-based image segmentation yielded relative differences of 0.22% and 0.16% for skeletal muscle, 0.47% and 0.49% for psoas muscle, 0.42% and 0.42% for VAT and 0.18% and 0.18% for SAT. AI-based fully automatic segmentation was significantly faster than semi-automatic segmentation (3 ± 0 s vs. 170 ± 40 s, P < 0.001, for User 1 and 152 ± 40 s, P < 0.001, for User 2).
Conclusion: Rapid fully automatic AI-based, PACS-integrated assessment of body composition yields identical results without transfer of critical patient data. Additional metabolic information can be inserted into the patient’s image report and offered to the referring clinicians.
en
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
dc.subject
Artificial intelligence
en
dc.subject
Image segmentation
en
dc.subject
Body composition
en
dc.subject
Sarcopenic obesity
en
dc.subject
Computed tomography
en
dc.subject.ddc
600 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften::610 Medizin und Gesundheit::610 Medizin und Gesundheit
dc.title
First PACS‐integrated artificial intelligence‐based software tool for rapid and fully automatic analysis of body composition from CT in clinical routine
dc.type
Wissenschaftlicher Artikel
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.doi
10.1002/crt2.44
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.journaltitle
JCSM Clinical Reports
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.number
1
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.originalpublishername
Wiley
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pagestart
3
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pageend
11
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.volume
7
refubium.affiliation
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
refubium.funding
DEAL Wiley
refubium.resourceType.isindependentpub
no
dcterms.accessRights.openaire
open access
dcterms.isPartOf.eissn
2521-3555