dc.contributor.author
Lim, Carolin
dc.contributor.author
Blaszczyk, Edyta
dc.contributor.author
Riazy, Leili
dc.contributor.author
Wiesemann, Stephanie
dc.contributor.author
Schüler, Johannes
dc.contributor.author
Knobelsdorff-Brenkenhoff, Florian von
dc.contributor.author
Schulz-Menger, Jeanette
dc.date.accessioned
2022-10-26T10:06:44Z
dc.date.available
2022-10-26T10:06:44Z
dc.identifier.uri
https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/36644
dc.identifier.uri
http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/refubium-36357
dc.description.abstract
Objectives: Quantification of myocardial deformation by feature tracking is of growing interest in cardiovascular magnetic resonance. It allows the assessment of regional myocardial function based on cine images. However, image acquisition, post-processing, and interpretation are not standardized. We aimed to assess the influence of segmentation procedure such as slice selection and different types of analysis software on values and quantification of myocardial strain in healthy adults.
Methods: Healthy volunteers were retrospectively analyzed. Post-processing was performed using CVI42 and TomTec. Longitudinal and radialLong axis (LAX) strain were quantified using 4-chamber-view, 3-chamber-view, and 2-chamber-view. Circumferential and radialShort axis (SAX) strain were assessed in basal, midventricular, and apical short-axis views and using full coverage. Global and segmental strain values were compared to each other regarding their post-processing approach and analysis software package.
Results: We screened healthy volunteers studied at 1.5 or 3.0 T and included 67 (age 44.3 ± 16.3 years, 31 females). Circumferential and radialSAX strain values were different between a full coverage approach vs. three short slices (− 17.6 ± 1.8% vs. − 19.2 ± 2.3% and 29.1 ± 4.8% vs. 34.6 ± 7.1%). Different analysis software calculated significantly different strain values. Within the same vendor, different field strengths (− 17.0 ± 2.1% at 1.5 T vs. − 17.0 ± 1.7% at 3 T, p = 0.845) did not influence the calculated global longitudinal strain (GLS), and were similar in gender (− 17.4 ± 2.0% in females vs. − 16.6 ± 1.8% in males, p = 0.098). Circumferential and radial strain were different in females and males (circumferential strain − 18.2 ± 1.7% vs. − 17.1 ± 1.8%, p = 0.029 and radial strain 30.7 ± 4.7% vs. 27.8 ± 4.6%, p = 0.047).
Conclusions: Myocardial deformation assessed by feature tracking depends on segmentation procedure and type of analysis software. CircumferentialSAX and radialSAX depend on the number of slices used for feature tracking analysis. As known from other imaging modalities, GLS seems to be the most stable parameter. During follow-up studies, standardized conditions should be warranted.
Trial registration: Retrospectively registered
en
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject
Magnetic resonance imaging
en
dc.subject
Left ventricular function
en
dc.subject
Healthy volunteers
en
dc.subject.ddc
600 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften::610 Medizin und Gesundheit::610 Medizin und Gesundheit
dc.title
Quantification of myocardial strain assessed by cardiovascular magnetic resonance feature tracking in healthy subjects—influence of segmentation and analysis software
dc.type
Wissenschaftlicher Artikel
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.doi
10.1007/s00330-020-07539-5
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.journaltitle
European Radiology
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.originalpublishername
Springer Nature
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pagestart
3962
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pageend
3972
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.volume
31
refubium.affiliation
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
refubium.funding
Springer Nature DEAL
refubium.resourceType.isindependentpub
no
dcterms.accessRights.openaire
open access
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pmid
33277669
dcterms.isPartOf.issn
0938-7994
dcterms.isPartOf.eissn
1432-1084