dc.contributor.author
Schömig, Friederike
dc.contributor.author
Pumberger, Matthias
dc.contributor.author
Palmowski, Yannick
dc.contributor.author
Ditges, Ann-Kathrin
dc.contributor.author
Diekhoff, Torsten
dc.contributor.author
Göhler, Friedemann
dc.date.accessioned
2022-09-21T09:51:56Z
dc.date.available
2022-09-21T09:51:56Z
dc.identifier.uri
https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/36403
dc.identifier.uri
http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/refubium-36119
dc.description.abstract
Objectives: To investigate the diagnostic accuracy of collagen-sensitive maps derived from dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) for the detection of lumbar disk pathologies in a feasibility setting.
Materials and methods: We retrospectively reviewed magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), computed tomography (CT), and DECT datasets acquired in patients who underwent periradicular therapy of the lumbar spine from June to December 2019. Three readers scored DECT collagen maps, conventional CT, and MRI for presence, type, and extent of disk pathology. Contingency table analyses were performed to determine diagnostic accuracy using MRI as standard of reference. Interrater agreement within and between imaging modalities was evaluated by computing intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and Cohen’s kappa. Correlation between sum scores of anteroposterior disk displacement was determined by calculation of a paired t test.
Results: In 21 disks in 13 patients, DECT had a sensitivity of 0.87 (0.60–0.98) and specificity of 1.00 (0.54–1.00) for the detection of disk pathology. Intermodality agreement for anteroposterior disk displacement was excellent for DECT (ICC 0.963 [0.909–0.985]) and superior to CT (ICC 0.876 [0.691–0.95]). For anteroposterior disk displacement, DECT also showed greater within-modality interrater agreement (ICC 0.820 [0.666–0.916]) compared with CT (ICC 0.624 [0.39–0.808]).
Conclusion: Our data suggest that collagen-sensitive imaging has an added benefit, allowing more accurate evaluation of the extent of disk displacement with higher interrater reliability. Thus, DECT could provide useful diagnostic information in patients undergoing CT for other indications or with contraindications to MRI.
en
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject
Vertebral disk
en
dc.subject
X-ray computed
en
dc.subject.ddc
600 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften::610 Medizin und Gesundheit::610 Medizin und Gesundheit
dc.title
Vertebral disk morphology of the lumbar spine: a retrospective analysis of collagen-sensitive mapping using dual-energy computed tomography
dc.type
Wissenschaftlicher Artikel
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.doi
10.1007/s00256-020-03685-5
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.journaltitle
Skeletal Radiology
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.originalpublishername
Springer Nature
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pagestart
1359
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pageend
1367
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.volume
50
refubium.affiliation
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
refubium.funding
Springer Nature DEAL
refubium.resourceType.isindependentpub
no
dcterms.accessRights.openaire
open access
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pmid
33277674
dcterms.isPartOf.issn
0364-2348
dcterms.isPartOf.eissn
1432-2161