dc.contributor.author
Laukkanen-Ninios, Riikka
dc.contributor.author
Ghidini, Sergio
dc.contributor.author
Gómez Laguna, Jaime
dc.contributor.author
Langkabel, Nina
dc.contributor.author
Santos, Susana
dc.contributor.author
Maurer, Patric
dc.contributor.author
Meemken, Diana
dc.contributor.author
Alban, Lis
dc.contributor.author
Alvseike, Ole
dc.contributor.author
Vieira-Pinto, Madalena
dc.date.accessioned
2022-11-30T12:37:33Z
dc.date.available
2022-11-30T12:37:33Z
dc.identifier.uri
https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/36388
dc.identifier.uri
http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/refubium-36104
dc.description.abstract
In the EU, a post-mortem inspection of finishing pigs comprises visual inspections of the carcass and offal followed by additional examinations, such as palpation and incision of parts, when needed. Moreover, it can include various laboratory tests. Since European meat inspection is regulated by the EU, one may assume that post-mortem inspection is performed in the same way in the Member States. However, previous studies showed that variations exist. This article shows the results of a survey performed in September 2020 on how visual meat inspection of finishing pigs is applied in Europe. By using a questionnaire, palpations, incisions and other procedures for 10 gross pathological findings and laboratory methods applied by official veterinarians to evaluate the fitness of meat for human consumption were assessed. We received 44 responses from 26 European countries. Most respondents reported that visual meat inspection was a generally applied inspection method. The main reason for not applying visual meat inspection was export requirements. The most important reasons for applying palpations and incisions in addition to visual inspection were findings detected in ante- or post-mortem inspection. There was considerable variation in the use of palpations and incisions, other post-mortem procedures and laboratory tests to assess meat fitness for human consumption. The respondents mentioned some country-specific practices, but we also observed variations within the responding official veterinarians that could not be explained by country of origin or years of work experience. Additional detailed studies on the variation are needed before harmonisation of meat inspection procedures are attempted.
en
dc.format.extent
13 Seiten
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject
Meat inspection
en
dc.subject
Veterinarians
en
dc.subject
Official controls
en
dc.subject.ddc
600 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften::630 Landwirtschaft::630 Landwirtschaft und verwandte Bereiche
dc.title
Additional post-mortem inspection procedures and laboratory methods as supplements for visual meat inspection of finishing pigs in Europe—Use and variability
dc.type
Wissenschaftlicher Artikel
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.doi
10.1007/s00003-022-01391-z
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.journaltitle
Journal of Consumer Protection and Food Safety
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.number
4
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pagestart
363
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pageend
375
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.volume
17
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.url
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00003-022-01391-z
refubium.affiliation
Veterinärmedizin
refubium.affiliation.other
Institut für Lebensmittelsicherheit und -hygiene
refubium.resourceType.isindependentpub
no
dcterms.accessRights.openaire
open access
dcterms.isPartOf.eissn
1661-5867
refubium.resourceType.provider
WoS-Alert