dc.contributor.author
Schulz, Matthias
dc.contributor.author
Afshar-Bakshloo, Melissa
dc.contributor.author
Koch, Arend
dc.contributor.author
Capper, David
dc.contributor.author
Driever, Pablo Hernáiz
dc.contributor.author
Tietze, Anna
dc.contributor.author
Grün, Arne
dc.contributor.author
Thomale, Ulrich-Wilhelm
dc.date.accessioned
2022-09-13T11:32:38Z
dc.date.available
2022-09-13T11:32:38Z
dc.identifier.uri
https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/36289
dc.identifier.uri
http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/refubium-36005
dc.description.abstract
Pineal region tumors commonly present with non-communicating hydrocephalus. These heterogeneous histological entities require different therapeutic regimens. We evaluated our surgical experience concerning procurance of a histological diagnosis, management of hydrocephalus, and choice of antitumoral treatment. We analyzed the efficacy of neuroendoscopic biopsy and endoscopic third ventriculocisternostomy (ETV) in patients with pineal region tumors between 2006 and 2019 in a single-center retrospective cross-sectional study with regard to diagnostic yield, hydrocephalus treatment, as well as impact on further antitumoral management. Out of 28 identified patients, 23 patients presented with untreated hydrocephalus and 25 without histological diagnosis. One patient underwent open biopsy, and 24 received a neuroendoscopic biopsy with concomitant hydrocephalus treatment if necessary. Eighteen primary ETVs, 2 secondary ETVs, and 2 ventriculoperitoneal shunts (VPSs) were performed. Endoscopic biopsy had a diagnostic yield of 95.8% (23/24) and complication rates of 12.5% (transient) and 4.2% (permanent), respectively. ETV for hydrocephalus management was successful in 89.5% (17/19) with a median follow-up of more than 3 years. Following histological diagnosis, 8 patients (28.6%) underwent primary resection of their tumor. Another 9 patients underwent later-stage resection after either adjuvant treatment (n = 5) or for progressive disease during observation (n = 4). Eventually, 20 patients received adjuvant treatment and 7 were observed after primary management. One patient was lost to follow-up. Heterogeneity of pineal region tumor requires histological confirmation. Primary biopsy of pineal lesions should precede surgical resection since less than a third of patients needed primary surgical resection according to the German pediatric brain tumor protocols. Interdisciplinary decision making upfront any treatment is warranted in order to adequately guide treatment.
en
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject
Pineal region tumor
en
dc.subject
Neuroendoscopy
en
dc.subject.ddc
600 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften::610 Medizin und Gesundheit::610 Medizin und Gesundheit
dc.title
Management of pineal region tumors in a pediatric case series
dc.type
Wissenschaftlicher Artikel
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.doi
10.1007/s10143-020-01323-1
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.journaltitle
Neurosurgical Review
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.originalpublishername
Springer Nature
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pagestart
1417
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pageend
1427
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.volume
44
refubium.affiliation
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
refubium.funding
Springer Nature DEAL
refubium.resourceType.isindependentpub
no
dcterms.accessRights.openaire
open access
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pmid
32504201
dcterms.isPartOf.issn
0344-5607
dcterms.isPartOf.eissn
1437-2320