dc.contributor.author
Kurreck, Annika
dc.contributor.author
Geissler, M.
dc.contributor.author
Martens, U. M.
dc.contributor.author
Riera-Knorrenschild, J.
dc.contributor.author
Greeve, J.
dc.contributor.author
Florschütz, A.
dc.contributor.author
Wessendorf, S.
dc.contributor.author
Ettrich, T.
dc.contributor.author
Kanzler, S.
dc.contributor.author
Nörenberg, D.
dc.contributor.author
Seidensticker, M.
dc.contributor.author
Held, S.
dc.contributor.author
Buechner-Steudel, P.
dc.contributor.author
Atzpodien, J.
dc.contributor.author
Heinemann, V.
dc.contributor.author
Stintzing, S.
dc.contributor.author
Seufferlein, T.
dc.contributor.author
Tannapfel, A.
dc.contributor.author
Reinacher-Schick, A. C.
dc.contributor.author
Modest, Dominik P.
dc.date.accessioned
2022-09-09T07:35:48Z
dc.date.available
2022-09-09T07:35:48Z
dc.identifier.uri
https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/36230
dc.identifier.uri
http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/refubium-35946
dc.description.abstract
Purpose: In mCRC, disease dynamics may play a critical role in the understanding of long-term outcome. We evaluated depth of response (DpR), time to DpR, and post-DpR survival as relevant endpoints.
Methods: We analyzed DpR by central review of computer tomography images (change from baseline to smallest tumor diameter), early tumor shrinkage (≥ 20% reduction in tumor diameter at first reassessment), time to DpR (study randomization to DpR-image), post-DpR progression-free survival (pPFS = DpR-image to tumor progression or death), and post-DpR overall survival (pOS = DpR-image to death) with special focus on BRAF status in 66 patients and primary tumor site in 86 patients treated within the VOLFI-trial, respectively.
Results: BRAF wild-type (BRAF-WT) compared to BRAF mutant (BRAF-MT) patients had greater DpR (− 57.6% vs. − 40.8%, p = 0.013) with a comparable time to DpR [4.0 (95% CI 3.1–4.4) vs. 3.9 (95% CI 2.5–5.5) months; p = 0.8852]. pPFS was 6.5 (95% CI 4.9–8.0) versus 2.6 (95% CI 1.2–4.0) months in favor of BRAF-WT patients (HR 0.24 (95% CI 0.11–0.53); p < 0.001). This transferred into a significant difference in pOS [33.6 (95% CI 26.0–41.3) vs. 5.4 (95% CI 5.0–5.9) months; HR 0.27 (95% CI 0.13–0.55); p < 0.001]. Similar observations were made for patients stratified for primary tumor site.
Conclusions: BRAF-MT patients derive a less profound treatment response compared to BRAF-WT patients. The difference in outcome according to BRAF status is evident after achievement of DpR with BRAF-MT patients hardly deriving any further disease control beyond DpR. Our observations hint towards an aggressive tumor evolution in BRAF-MT tumors, which may already be molecularly detectable at the time of DpR.
en
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject
Metastatic colorectal cancer
en
dc.subject
Disease dynamics
en
dc.subject
Depth of response
en
dc.subject
Early tumor shrinkage
en
dc.subject
Primary tumor site
en
dc.subject
Combination chemotherapy
en
dc.subject.ddc
600 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften::610 Medizin und Gesundheit::610 Medizin und Gesundheit
dc.title
Dynamics in treatment response and disease progression of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients with focus on BRAF status and primary tumor location: analysis of untreated RAS-wild-type mCRC patients receiving FOLFOXIRI either with or without panitumumab in the VOLFI trial (AIO KRK0109)
dc.type
Wissenschaftlicher Artikel
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.doi
10.1007/s00432-020-03257-z
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.journaltitle
Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.originalpublishername
Springer Nature
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pagestart
2681
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pageend
2691
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.volume
146
refubium.affiliation
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
refubium.funding
Springer Nature DEAL
refubium.resourceType.isindependentpub
no
dcterms.accessRights.openaire
open access
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pmid
32449003
dcterms.isPartOf.issn
0171-5216
dcterms.isPartOf.eissn
1432-1335