dc.contributor.author
Niemann, Marcel
dc.contributor.author
Braun, Karl F.
dc.contributor.author
Ahmad, Sufian S.
dc.contributor.author
Stöckle, Ulrich
dc.contributor.author
Märdian, Sven
dc.contributor.author
Graef, Frank
dc.date.accessioned
2022-09-05T12:48:48Z
dc.date.available
2022-09-05T12:48:48Z
dc.identifier.uri
https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/36181
dc.identifier.uri
http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/refubium-35897
dc.description.abstract
Background and Objective: Various fixation devices and surgical techniques are available for the management of proximal femur fractures. Recently, the femoral neck system (FNS) was introduced, and was promoted on the basis of less invasiveness, shorter operating time, and less fluoroscopy time compared to previous systems. The aim of this study was to compare two systems for the internal fixation of femoral neck fractures (FNF), namely the dynamic hip screw (DHS) with an anti-rotation screw (ARS) and an FNS. The outcome measures included operating room time (ORT), dose–area product (DAP), length of stay (LOS), perioperative changes in haemoglobin concentrations, and transfusion rate. Materials and Methods: A retrospective single-centre study was conducted. Patients treated for FNF between 1 January 2020 and 30 September 2021 were included, provided that they had undergone closed reduction and internal fixation. We measured the centrum-collum-diaphyseal (CCD) and the Pauwels angle preoperatively and one week postoperatively. Results: In total, 31 patients (16 females), with a mean age of 62.81 ± 15.05 years, were included. Fracture complexity assessed by the Pauwels and Garden classification did not differ between groups preoperatively. Nonetheless, the ORT (54 ± 26.1 min vs. 91.68 ± 23.96 min, p < 0.01) and DAP (721 ± 270.6 cGycm² vs. 1604 ± 1178 cGycm², p = 0.03) were significantly lower in the FNS group. The pre- and postoperative CCD and Pauwels angles did not differ statistically between groups. Perioperative haemoglobin concentration changes (–1.77 ± 1.19 g/dl vs. –1.74 ± 1.37 g/dl) and LOS (8 ± 5.27 days vs. 7.35 ± 3.43 days) were not statistically different. Conclusions: In this cohort, the ORT and DAP were almost halved in the patient group treated with FNS. This may confer a reduction in secondary risks related to surgery.
en
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject
dynamic hip screw
en
dc.subject
femoral neck system
en
dc.subject
femoral neck fracture
en
dc.subject
individual medicine
en
dc.subject
minimal-invasive surgery
en
dc.subject
multiple trauma
en
dc.subject.ddc
600 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften::610 Medizin und Gesundheit::610 Medizin und Gesundheit
dc.title
Comparing Perioperative Outcome Measures of the Dynamic Hip Screw and the Femoral Neck System
dc.type
Wissenschaftlicher Artikel
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.articlenumber
352
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.doi
10.3390/medicina58030352
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.journaltitle
Medicina
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.number
3
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.originalpublishername
MDPI AG
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.volume
58
refubium.affiliation
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
refubium.resourceType.isindependentpub
no
dcterms.accessRights.openaire
open access
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pmid
35334528
dcterms.isPartOf.eissn
1648-9144