dc.contributor.author
Vogt, Lisa
dc.contributor.author
Werner, Jonas
dc.date.accessioned
2024-04-22T07:07:41Z
dc.date.available
2024-04-22T07:07:41Z
dc.identifier.uri
https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/36129
dc.identifier.uri
http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/refubium-35845
dc.description.abstract
The thesis of Weak Unrestricted Composition says that every pair of objects has a fusion. This thesis has been argued by Contessa (Analysis 72(3):455–457, 2012) and Smith (Erkenntnis 84(1):41–55, 2019) to be compatible with the world being junky and hence to evade an argument against the necessity of Strong Unrestricted Composition proposed by Bohn (Analysis 69(1):27–31, 2009a, Philos Q 59(235):193–201, 2009b). However, neither Weak Unrestricted Composition alone nor the different variants of it that have been proposed in the literature can provide us with a satisfying answer to the special composition question, or so we will argue. We will then go on to explore an alternative family of purely mereological rules in the vicinity of Weak Unrestricted Composition, Cardinal Composition: A plurality of pairwise non-overlapping objects composes an object iff the objects in the plurality are of cardinality smaller than κ. As we will show, all the instances for infinite κs determine fusion and are compatible with junk, and every instance for a κ>ℵ0 is furthermore compatible with gunk and dense chains of parthood.
en
dc.format.extent
23 Seiten
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject
Weak Unrestricted Composition
en
dc.subject
Strong Unrestricted Composition
en
dc.subject.ddc
100 Philosophie und Psychologie::100 Philosophie::102 Verschiedenes
dc.title
Cardinal Composition
dc.type
Wissenschaftlicher Artikel
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.doi
10.1007/s10670-022-00591-1
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.journaltitle
Erkenntnis
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.number
4
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pagestart
1457
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pageend
1479
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.volume
89
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.url
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-022-00591-1
refubium.affiliation
Philosophie und Geisteswissenschaften
refubium.affiliation.other
Institut für Philosophie
refubium.resourceType.isindependentpub
no
dcterms.accessRights.openaire
open access
dcterms.isPartOf.eissn
1572-8420
refubium.resourceType.provider
WoS-Alert