dc.contributor.author
Krois, Joachim
dc.contributor.author
Krasowski, Aleksander
dc.contributor.author
Rossi, Jesus Gomez
dc.contributor.author
Paris, Sebastian
dc.contributor.author
Kuhlmey, Adelheid
dc.contributor.author
Meyer-Lückel, Hendrik
dc.contributor.author
Schwendicke, Falk
dc.date.accessioned
2022-08-22T12:37:18Z
dc.date.available
2022-08-22T12:37:18Z
dc.identifier.uri
https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/35973
dc.identifier.uri
http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/refubium-35688
dc.description.abstract
Objectives: We aimed to assess periodontal services utilization in very old Germans. Methods A comprehensive sample of very old (≥ 75 years), insured at a large Northeastern statutory insurer was followed over 6 years (2012-2017). We assessed periodontal service provision, entailing (1) periodontal screening index (PSI), (2) periodontal status/treatment planning, (3) periodontal therapy (scaling and root planning with or without access surgery), (4) postoperative reevaluation, and (5) any of these four services groups. Association of utilization with (1) sex, (2) age, (3) region, (4) social hardship status, (5) ICD-10 diagnoses, and (6) diagnoses-related groups was explored.
Results: 404.610 individuals were followed; 173,733 did not survive follow-up. The mean (SD) age was 81.9 (5.4) years. 29.4% (119,103 individuals) utilized any periodontal service, nearly all of them the PSI. Periodontal status/treatment planning, treatment provision, and reevaluation were provided to only a small fraction (1.54-1.57%, or 6224-6345) of individuals. The utilization of the PSI increased between 2012 and 2017; no such increase was observed for treatment-related services. Utilization decreased with age; those aged > 85 years received nearly no services at all. Decreases were more pronounced for treatment-related services. Utilization was lower in rural than urban areas, those with hardship status, and those severely ill (e.g., dementia, heart insufficiency). In multivariable analysis, a previous PSI measurement tripled the odds of receiving treatment-related services (OR: 3.2; 95% CI: 3.0-3.4).
Conclusions: Periodontal services utilization was low. Screening for periodontal disease significantly increased therapy provision. Social, demographic, regional, and general health aspects were associated with utilization.
Clinical significance: The utilization of periodontal services in the very old in Northeast Germany was low, and even screening was only performed in a minority of individuals. Policies to increase identification and management of periodontitis especially in the most vulnerable individuals are needed.
en
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject
Gerodontology
en
dc.subject
Health services research
en
dc.subject
Periodontology
en
dc.subject
Periodontal screening index
en
dc.subject.ddc
600 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften::610 Medizin und Gesundheit::610 Medizin und Gesundheit
dc.title
Underscreening and undertreatment? Periodontal service provision in very old Germans
dc.type
Wissenschaftlicher Artikel
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.doi
10.1007/s00784-020-03635-4
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.journaltitle
Clinical Oral Investigations
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.number
5
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.originalpublishername
Springer Nature
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pagestart
3117
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pageend
3129
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.volume
25
refubium.affiliation
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
refubium.funding
Springer Nature DEAL
refubium.resourceType.isindependentpub
no
dcterms.accessRights.openaire
open access
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pmid
33098031
dcterms.isPartOf.issn
1432-6981
dcterms.isPartOf.eissn
1436-3771