dc.contributor.author
Hempel, Fabian M.
dc.contributor.author
Krois, Joachim
dc.contributor.author
Paris, Sebastian
dc.contributor.author
Beuer, Florian
dc.contributor.author
Kuhlmey, Adelheid
dc.contributor.author
Schwendicke, Falk
dc.date.accessioned
2022-08-18T10:10:13Z
dc.date.available
2022-08-18T10:10:13Z
dc.identifier.uri
https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/35949
dc.identifier.uri
http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/refubium-35664
dc.description.abstract
Objectives: We assessed dental prosthetic services utilization in very old Germans.
Methods: A comprehensive sample of 404,610 very old (≥ 75 years), insured at one large statutory insurer (Allgemeine Ortskrankenkasse Nordost, acting in the federal states Berlin, Brandenburg, Mecklenburg-Vorpommern), were followed over 6 years (2012-2017). Our outcome was the utilization of prosthetic services, in total and seven subgroups: (1) Crowns/partial crowns, (2) fixed dental prostheses (FDPs), (3) partial removable prostheses (RDPs), (4) full RDPs, (5) temporary services, (6) relining/rebasing/repairing/extending RDPs, (7) repairing FDPs. Association of utilization with (1) gender, (2) age, (3) region, (4) social hardship status, (5) ICD-10 diagnoses and (6) German diagnoses related groups (G-DRG) was explored.
Results: The mean (SD) age of the sample was 81.9 (5.4) years; mean follow-up was 1689 (705) days. The mean utilization of any prosthetic service was 27.0%; the most often utilized service type were total RDPs (13.2% utilization), crowns (8.1%), and partial RDPs (7.1%). Utilization decreased with age for nearly all services (except relining/rebasing/repairing/extending RDPs). Utilization of prosthetic services was significantly higher in Berlin and most cities compared with rural municipalities and in individuals with common, less severe conditions according to ICD-10 and DRGs compared with life-threatening conditions or dementia. In multivariable analysis, gender (OR; 95% CI: 0.95; 0.93-0.98), social hardship status (1.19; 1.17-1.21), federal state (Brandenburg 0.57; 0.56-0.59; Mecklenburg-Vorpommern: 0.66; 0.64-0.67) and age significantly affected utilization (0.95; 0.95-0.95/year).
Conclusions: Patient-related and healthcare factors determine the utilization of prosthetic services in very old Germans. Interventions to maintain sufficient prosthetic care up to high age are required.
Clinical significance: The utilization of prosthetic services in the very old in Northeast Germany showed significant disparities within populations and service types. There seems to be great need to better understand the drivers of utilization, and to develop and evaluate interventions to maintain sufficient prosthetic care up to high age.
en
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject
Gerodontology
en
dc.subject
Health services research
en
dc.subject
Prosthodontics
en
dc.subject.ddc
600 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften::610 Medizin und Gesundheit::610 Medizin und Gesundheit
dc.title
Prosthetic treatment patterns in the very old: an insurance database analysis from Northeast Germany
dc.type
Wissenschaftlicher Artikel
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.doi
10.1007/s00784-020-03264-x
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.journaltitle
Clinical Oral Investigations
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.number
11
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.originalpublishername
Springer Nature
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.volume
24
refubium.affiliation
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
refubium.funding
Springer Nature DEAL
refubium.resourceType.isindependentpub
no
dcterms.accessRights.openaire
open access
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pmid
32300981
dcterms.isPartOf.issn
1432-6981
dcterms.isPartOf.eissn
1436-3771