dc.contributor.author
Eder, Patrick Andreas
dc.contributor.author
Laux, Gunter
dc.contributor.author
Rashid, Asarnusch
dc.contributor.author
Kniess, Tobias
dc.contributor.author
Haeusler, Karl Georg
dc.contributor.author
Shammas, Layal
dc.contributor.author
Griewing, Bernd
dc.contributor.author
Hofmann, Susanne
dc.contributor.author
Stangl, Stephanie
dc.contributor.author
Wiedmann, Silke
dc.contributor.author
Rücker, Viktoria
dc.contributor.author
Heuschmann, Peter U.
dc.contributor.author
Soda, Hassan
dc.contributor.author
Stroke Angel Study Group
dc.date.accessioned
2022-08-12T12:22:25Z
dc.date.available
2022-08-12T12:22:25Z
dc.identifier.uri
https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/35880
dc.identifier.uri
http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/refubium-35595
dc.description.abstract
Introduction: Door-to-CT scan time (DCT) and door-to-needle time (DNT) are important process measures in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients undergoing intravenous thrombolysis (IVT). We examined the impact of a telemedical prenotification by emergency medical service (EMS) (called the “Stroke Angel” program) on DCT and DNT and IVT rate compared to standard of care.
Patients and Methods: Two prospective observational studies including AIS patients admitted via EMS from 2011 to 2013 (cohort I; n = 496) and from January 1, 2015 to May 31, 2018 (cohort II; n = 349) were conducted. After cohort I, the 4-Item Stroke Scale and a digital thrombolysis protocol were added. Multivariable logistic and linear regression analysis was performed.
Results: In cohort I, DCT was lower in the intervention group (13 vs. 26 min using standard of care; p < 0.001), but no significant difference in median DNT (35 vs. 39 min; p = 0.24) was observed. In cohort II, a reduction of DCT (8 vs. 15 min; p < 0.001) and DNT (25 vs. 29 min p = 0.003) was observed in the intervention group. Compared to standard of care, the likelihood of DCT ≤10 min or DNT ≤20 min in the intervention group was 2.7 (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.7; 95% CI: 2.1–3.5) and 1.8 (aOR 1.8; 95% CI: 1.1–2.9), respectively. In cohort II, IVT rate was higher (aOR 1.4; 95% CI: 1.1–1.9) in the intervention group.
Conclusion: Although the positive effects of Stroke Angel in AIS provided a rationale for implementation in routine care, larger studies of practice implementation will be needed. Using Stroke Angel in the prehospital management of AIS impacts on important process measures of IVT delivery.
en
dc.subject
Telemedicine
en
dc.subject
Acute ischemic stroke
en
dc.subject
Emergency medical services
en
dc.subject
Intravenous thrombolysis
en
dc.subject.ddc
600 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften::610 Medizin und Gesundheit::610 Medizin und Gesundheit
dc.title
Stroke Angel: Effect of Telemedical Prenotification on In-Hospital Delays and Systemic Thrombolysis in Acute Stroke Patients
dc.type
Wissenschaftlicher Artikel
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.doi
10.1159/000514563
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.journaltitle
Cerebrovascular Diseases
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.number
4
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.originalpublishername
Karger
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pagestart
420
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pageend
428
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.volume
50
dcterms.rightsHolder.note
Copyright applies in this work.
dcterms.rightsHolder.url
http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
refubium.affiliation
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
refubium.note.author
Dieser Beitrag ist mit Zustimmung des Rechteinhabers aufgrund einer (DFG geförderten) Allianz- bzw. Nationallizenz frei zugänglich.
de
refubium.note.author
This publication is shared with permission of the rights owner and made freely accessible through a DFG (German Research Foundation) funded license at either an alliance or national level.
en
refubium.resourceType.isindependentpub
no
dcterms.accessRights.openaire
open access
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pmid
33774614
dcterms.isPartOf.issn
1015-9770
dcterms.isPartOf.eissn
1421-9786