dc.contributor.author
Schneider, Vera S.
dc.contributor.author
Böhm, Felix
dc.contributor.author
Blum, Katharina
dc.contributor.author
Riedel, Matthias
dc.contributor.author
Abdelwahed, Youssef S.
dc.contributor.author
Klotsche, Jens
dc.contributor.author
Steiner, Julia K.
dc.contributor.author
Heuberger, Andrea
dc.contributor.author
Skurk, Carsten
dc.contributor.author
Mochmann, Hans-Christian
dc.contributor.author
Lauten, Alexander
dc.contributor.author
Fröhlich, Georg
dc.contributor.author
Rauch-Kröhnert, Ursula
dc.contributor.author
Haghikia, Arash
dc.contributor.author
Sinning, David
dc.contributor.author
Stähli, Barbara E.
dc.contributor.author
Landmesser, Ulf
dc.contributor.author
Leistner, David M.
dc.date.accessioned
2022-08-04T11:04:24Z
dc.date.available
2022-08-04T11:04:24Z
dc.identifier.uri
https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/35722
dc.identifier.uri
http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/refubium-35437
dc.description.abstract
Aims: Longitudinal geographic mismatch (LGM) as well as edge dissections are associated with an increased risk of adverse events after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Recently, a novel system of real-time optical coherence tomography (OCT) with angiographic co-registration (ACR) became available and allows matched integration of cross-sectional OCT images to angiography. The OPTICO-integration II trial sought to assess the impact of ACR for PCI planning on the risk of LGM and edge dissections.
Methods: A total of 84 patients were prospectively randomized to ACR-guided PCI, OCT-guided PCI (without co-registration), and angiography-guided PCI. Primary endpoint was a composite of major edge dissection and/or LGM as assessed by post-PCI OCT.
Results: The primary endpoint was significantly reduced in ACR-guided PCI (4.2%) as compared to OCT-guided PCI (19.1%; p = 0.03) and angiography-guided PCI (25.5%; p < 0.01). Rates of LGM were 4.2%, 17.0%, and 22.9% in the ACR-guided PCI, in the OCT-guided PCI, and the angiography-guided PCI groups, respectively (ACR vs. OCT p = 0.04; ACR vs. angiography p = 0.04). The number of major edge dissections was low and without significant differences among the study groups (0% vs. 2.1% vs. 4.3%).
Conclusion: This study for the first time demonstrates superiority of ACR-guided PCI over OCT- and angiography-guided PCI in reducing the composite endpoint of major edge dissection and LGM, which was meanly driven by a reduction of LGM.
en
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject
Angiographic co-registration
en
dc.subject
Geographic mismatch
en
dc.subject
Edge dissection
en
dc.subject.ddc
600 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften::610 Medizin und Gesundheit::610 Medizin und Gesundheit
dc.title
Impact of real-time angiographic co-registered optical coherence tomography on percutaneous coronary intervention: the OPTICO-integration II trial
dc.type
Wissenschaftlicher Artikel
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.doi
10.1007/s00392-020-01739-1
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.journaltitle
Clinical Research in Cardiology
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.originalpublishername
Springer Nature
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pagestart
249
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pageend
257
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.volume
110
refubium.affiliation
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
refubium.funding
Springer Nature DEAL
refubium.resourceType.isindependentpub
no
dcterms.accessRights.openaire
open access
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pmid
32889633
dcterms.isPartOf.issn
1861-0684
dcterms.isPartOf.eissn
1861-0692