dc.contributor.author
Heinemann, Volker
dc.contributor.author
Weikersthal, Ludwig Fischer von
dc.contributor.author
Decker, Thomas
dc.contributor.author
Kiani, Alexander
dc.contributor.author
Kaiser, Florian
dc.contributor.author
Al-Batran, Salah-Edin
dc.contributor.author
Heintges, Tobias
dc.contributor.author
Lerchenmüller, Christoph
dc.contributor.author
Kahl, Christoph
dc.contributor.author
Seipelt, Gernot
dc.contributor.author
Kullmann, Frank
dc.contributor.author
Moehler, Markus
dc.contributor.author
Scheithauer, Werner
dc.contributor.author
Held, Swantje
dc.contributor.author
Miller-Phillips, Lisa
dc.contributor.author
Modest, Dominik Paul
dc.contributor.author
Jung, Andreas
dc.contributor.author
Kirchner, Thomas
dc.contributor.author
Stintzing, Sebastian
dc.date.accessioned
2022-07-11T10:15:34Z
dc.date.available
2022-07-11T10:15:34Z
dc.identifier.uri
https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/35521
dc.identifier.uri
http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/refubium-35236
dc.description.abstract
Background: Cetuximab plus FOLFIRI improved overall survival compared with bevacizumab plus FOLFIRI in KRAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) in FIRE-3, but no corresponding benefit was found for progression-free survival. This analysis aimed to determine whether cetuximab improves response and survival versus bevacizumab among response-evaluable patients receiving first-line FOLFIRI for RAS wild-type mCRC and the effect of primary tumour side on outcomes.
Methods: The intent-to-treat population included 593 patients with KRAS exon 2 wild-type mCRC. Further testing identified 400 patients with extended RAS wild-type disease; of these, 352 (88%) who received ≥3 cycles of therapy and had ≥1 post-baseline scan were evaluable for response and constituted the per-protocol population (169 cetuximab and 183 bevacizumab). Patients received 5-fluorouracil, folinic acid and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) with either weekly cetuximab or biweekly bevacizumab given on day 1 of each 14-day cycle until response, progression or toxicity occurred. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate (ORR) in the per-protocol population. Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). The effect of primary tumour location was evaluated.
Results: Median OS in the RAS wild-type population was 31 vs 26 months in the cetuximab and bevacizumab groups, respectively (HR 0.76, P = 0.012). In the per-protocol population, outcomes favoured cetuximab for ORR (77% vs 65%, P = 0.014) and median OS (33 vs 26 months, HR 0.75, P = 0.011), while PFS was comparable between groups. The advantage of cetuximab over bevacizumab occurred only in patients with left-sided primary tumours.
Conclusions: FOLFIRI plus cetuximab resulted in a significantly higher ORR and longer OS compared to FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab among patients with left-sided tumours. The superior response associated with cetuximab may particularly benefit patients with symptomatic tumours or borderline-resectable metastases.
CLINICALTRIALS.Gov identifier: NCT00433927.
en
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject
metastatic colorectal cancer
en
dc.subject
progression-free survival
en
dc.subject.ddc
600 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften::610 Medizin und Gesundheit::610 Medizin und Gesundheit
dc.title
FOLFIRI plus cetuximab or bevacizumab for advanced colorectal cancer: final survival and per-protocol analysis of FIRE-3, a randomised clinical trial
dc.type
Wissenschaftlicher Artikel
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.doi
10.1038/s41416-020-01140-9
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.journaltitle
British Journal of Cancer
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.number
3
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.originalpublishername
Springer Nature
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pagestart
587
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pageend
594
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.volume
124
refubium.affiliation
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
refubium.funding
Springer Nature DEAL
refubium.resourceType.isindependentpub
no
dcterms.accessRights.openaire
open access
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pmid
33154570
dcterms.isPartOf.issn
0007-0920
dcterms.isPartOf.eissn
1532-1827