dc.contributor.author
Fehrenbach, Uli
dc.contributor.author
Gül-Klein, Safak
dc.contributor.author
Sousa Mendes, Miguel de
dc.contributor.author
Steffen, Ingo
dc.contributor.author
Stern, Julienne
dc.contributor.author
Geisel, Dominik
dc.contributor.author
Puhl, Gero
dc.contributor.author
Denecke, Timm
dc.date.accessioned
2022-06-23T08:04:14Z
dc.date.available
2022-06-23T08:04:14Z
dc.identifier.uri
https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/35382
dc.identifier.uri
http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/refubium-35098
dc.description.abstract
Purpose: With the spread of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts (TIPS), portosystemic shunt surgery (PSSS) has decreased and leaves more complex patients with great demands for accurate preoperative planning. The aim was to evaluate the role of imaging for predicting the most suitable PSSS approach.
Material and methods: Forty-four patients who underwent PSSS (2002 to 2013) were examined by contrast-enhanced CT (n = 33) and/or MRI (n = 15) prior to surgery. Imaging was analyzed independently by two observers (O1 and O2) with different levels of experience (O1 > O2). They recommended two shunting techniques (vessels and anastomotic variant) for each patient and ranked them according to their appropriateness and complexity. Findings were compared with the actually performed shunt procedure and its outcome.
Results: The first two choices taken together covered the performed PSSS regarding vessels in 88%/100% (CT/MRI, O1) and 76%/73% (O2); and vessels + anastomosis in 79%/73% (O1) and 67%/60% (O2). The prediction of complex surgical procedures (resection of interposing structures, additional thrombectomy, use of a collateral vessel, and use of a graft interposition) was confirmed in 87%, resulting in 80% sensitivity and 96% specificity. Larger shunt vessel distances were associated with therapy failure (p = 0.030) and a vessel distance of ≥ 20 mm was identified as optimal cutoff, in which a graft interposition was used. There was no significant difference between MRI and CT in predicting the intraoperative decisions (p = 0.294 to 1.000).
Conclusion: Preoperative imaging and an experienced radiologist can guide surgeons in PSSS. CT and MRI provide the information necessary to identify technically feasible variants and complicating factors.
en
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject
Portosystemic shunt surgery
en
dc.subject
Magnetic resonance imaging
en
dc.subject
Computed tomography
en
dc.subject
Portal hypertension
en
dc.subject.ddc
600 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften::610 Medizin und Gesundheit::610 Medizin und Gesundheit
dc.title
Portosystemic shunt surgery in the era of TIPS: imaging-based planning of the surgical approach
dc.type
Wissenschaftlicher Artikel
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.doi
10.1007/s00261-020-02599-z
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.journaltitle
Abdominal Radiology
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.number
9
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.originalpublishername
Springer Nature
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pagestart
2726
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pageend
2735
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.volume
45
refubium.affiliation
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
refubium.funding
Springer Nature DEAL
refubium.resourceType.isindependentpub
no
dcterms.accessRights.openaire
open access
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pmid
32504130
dcterms.isPartOf.issn
2366-004X
dcterms.isPartOf.eissn
2366-0058