dc.contributor.author
Timmermans, R.
dc.contributor.author
Pinxteren, D. van
dc.contributor.author
Kranenburg, R.
dc.contributor.author
Hendriks, C.
dc.contributor.author
Fomba, K. W.
dc.contributor.author
Herrmann, H.
dc.contributor.author
Schaap, Martijn
dc.date.accessioned
2022-06-20T12:06:38Z
dc.date.available
2022-06-20T12:06:38Z
dc.identifier.uri
https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/35340
dc.identifier.uri
http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/refubium-35056
dc.description.abstract
Due to its serious health impact particulate matter is one of the air pollutants subject to abatement policies. Information on the main sources responsible for high concentrations of pollutants is therefore crucial to enable effective policy measures. In this study we compared two different methods for attribution of particulate matter concentrations to different sources: A tagging approach within the regional chemistry transport model LOTOS-EUROS and an observational method using speciated particulate matter observations and Positive Matrix Factorisation (PMF). The methods have been applied for winter 2016/2017 over Eastern Germany where in wintertime high woodburning emissions, cold temperatures and regular easterly winds can lead to a build-up of pollutant concentrations. The comparison allows the validation of the modelled source attribution for a selection of source categories. The contributions for biomass and total combustion compare well between both methods providing trust in the determined contributions, applied emissions including their timing. The total contribution from combustion is estimated between 3.3-7.7 μg/m3 (PMF) and 3.3-7.2 μg/m3 (LOTOS-EUROS) for the 9 stations incorporated in the study. The temporal Pearson correlation coefficient ranges between 0.3-0.64 for total combustion and 0.34 and 0.7 for biomass combustion. The mean absolute contributions for traffic at background stations also compare well with most values between 1.5-2.0 μg/m3 for PMF and 1–1.6 μg/m3 for LOTOS-EUROS. A lack of correlation for this contribution however suggests that the model has difficulty in representing the source category traffic in a time consistent manner and developments are needed to improve the temporal distribution of the traffic emissions within the model. The modelled particulate matter concentrations displayed a 20–40% underestimation of the observed concentrations with an increasing bias during high pollution events. The underestimation showed a high correlation with the observed contribution from combustion and secondary particulate matter including ammonium sulfate and organic carbon suggesting that at least a part of the missing mass in LOTOS-EUROS is related to transformation of volatile combustion emissions, likely from solid fuels, to secondary particle mass and missing enhanced formation of sulfate. Implementation of these missing processes would help to improve the source attribution of particulate matter with the LOTOS-EUROS model.
en
dc.format.extent
14 Seiten
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.subject
Source attribution
en
dc.subject
Air pollution
en
dc.subject
Chemistry transport model
en
dc.subject
Particulate matter
en
dc.subject.ddc
500 Naturwissenschaften und Mathematik::550 Geowissenschaften, Geologie::550 Geowissenschaften
dc.title
Evaluation of modelled LOTOS-EUROS with observational based PM10 source attribution
dc.type
Wissenschaftlicher Artikel
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.articlenumber
100173
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.doi
10.1016/j.aeaoa.2022.100173
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.journaltitle
Atmospheric Environment: X
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.volume
14
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.url
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aeaoa.2022.100173
refubium.affiliation
Geowissenschaften
refubium.affiliation.other
Institut für Meteorologie
refubium.resourceType.isindependentpub
no
dcterms.accessRights.openaire
open access
dcterms.isPartOf.eissn
2590-1621
refubium.resourceType.provider
WoS-Alert