dc.contributor.author
Gernun, Solveig
dc.contributor.author
Franzen, Klaas F.
dc.contributor.author
Mallock, Nadja
dc.contributor.author
Benthien, Julia
dc.contributor.author
Luch, Andreas
dc.contributor.author
Mortensen, Kai
dc.contributor.author
Drömann, Daniel
dc.contributor.author
Pogarell, Oliver
dc.contributor.author
Rüther, Tobias
dc.contributor.author
Rabenstein, Andrea
dc.date.accessioned
2022-05-24T08:57:18Z
dc.date.available
2022-05-24T08:57:18Z
dc.identifier.uri
https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/35131
dc.identifier.uri
http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/refubium-34848
dc.description.abstract
Introduction:
The rapid growth in the e-cigarette market after the launch of JUUL e-cigarettes led to much discussion on the potential benefits and risks of pods, JUUL devices, and conventional e-cigarettes compared with combustible cigarettes. Independent data are required to assess the effects of these products on cardiovascular surrogate parameters and cardiovascular risk.
Methods:
We conducted a single-center three-arm study comparing combustible cigarettes with JUUL e-cigarettes with the old and new technology. We recruited 32 participants who were active smokers (n=15) or vapers (n=17) and performed a total of 39 measurements before and 5, 15, and 30 minutes, after participants smoked a combustible cigarette or vaped a JUUL e-cigarette with the new or old technology. Measurements included peripheral and central blood pressures and parameters of arterial stiffness, including pulse wave velocity and augmentation index.
Results:
Peripheral systolic blood pressure, central blood pressure, and peripheral pulse rate increased significantly in all three groups (each p<0.05). Heart rate (HR) changes lasted significantly longer than blood pressure changes. The augmentation index and pulse wave velocity increased in all three groups, and a multivariate analysis of variance showed that the increases were independent of systolic blood pressure, sex, age, device, and HR.
Conclusions:
Changes in blood pressure and arterial stiffness are similar after cigarette smoking and JUUL use. These changes may be associated with an increased cardiovascular risk compared with no product use. However, a longterm follow-up evaluation of JUUL use and a head-to-head comparison with conventional e-cigarettes are still needed.
en
dc.format.extent
11 Seiten
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject
arterial stiffness
en
dc.subject
electronic cigarette
en
dc.subject.ddc
600 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften::610 Medizin und Gesundheit::610 Medizin und Gesundheit
dc.title
Cardiovascular functions and arterial stiffness after JUUL use
dc.type
Wissenschaftlicher Artikel
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.articlenumber
34
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.doi
10.18332/tid/144317
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.journaltitle
Tobacco Induced Diseases
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.volume
20
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.url
https://doi.org/10.18332/tid/144317
refubium.affiliation
Biologie, Chemie, Pharmazie
refubium.affiliation.other
Institut für Pharmazie
refubium.resourceType.isindependentpub
no
dcterms.accessRights.openaire
open access
dcterms.isPartOf.eissn
1617-9625
refubium.resourceType.provider
WoS-Alert