dc.contributor.author
Winter, Sebastian F.
dc.contributor.author
Vaios, Eugene J.
dc.contributor.author
Muzikansky, Alona
dc.contributor.author
Martinez‐Lage, Maria
dc.contributor.author
Bussière, Marc R.
dc.contributor.author
Shih, Helen A.
dc.contributor.author
Loeffler, Jay
dc.contributor.author
Karschnia, Philipp
dc.contributor.author
Loebel, Franziska
dc.contributor.author
Vajkoczy, Peter
dc.contributor.author
Dietrich, Jorg
dc.date.accessioned
2022-03-17T12:46:31Z
dc.date.available
2022-03-17T12:46:31Z
dc.identifier.uri
https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/34434
dc.identifier.uri
http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/refubium-34152
dc.description.abstract
Background:
Pseudoprogression (PP) and treatment‐induced brain tissue necrosis (TN) are challenging cancer treatment–related effects. Both phenomena remain insufficiently defined; differentiation from recurrent disease frequently necessitates tissue biopsy. We here characterize distinctive features of PP and TN to facilitate noninvasive diagnosis and clinical management.
Materials and Methods:
Patients with glioma and confirmed PP (defined as appearance <5 months after radiotherapy [RT] completion) or TN (>5 months after RT) were retrospectively compared using clinical, radiographic, and histopathological data. Each imaging event/lesion (region of interest [ROI]) diagnosed as PP or TN was longitudinally evaluated by serial imaging.
Results:
We identified 64 cases of mostly (80%) biopsy‐confirmed PP (n = 27) and TN (n = 37), comprising 137 ROIs in total. Median time of onset for PP and TN was 1 and 11 months after RT, respectively. Clinically, PP occurred more frequently during active antineoplastic treatment, necessitated more steroid‐based interventions, and was associated with glioblastoma (81 vs. 40%), fewer IDH1 mutations, and shorter median overall survival. Radiographically, TN lesions often initially manifested periventricularly (n = 22/37; 60%), were more numerous (median, 2 vs. 1 ROIs), and contained fewer malignant elements upon biopsy. By contrast, PP predominantly developed around the tumor resection cavity as a non‐nodular, ring‐like enhancing structure. Both PP and TN lesions almost exclusively developed in the main prior radiation field. Presence of either condition appeared to be associated with above‐average overall survival.
Conclusion:
PP and TN occur in clinically distinct patient populations and exhibit differences in spatial radiographic pattern. Increased familiarity with both conditions and their unique features will improve patient management and may avoid unnecessary surgical procedures.
Implications for Practice:
Pseudoprogression (PP) and treatment‐induced brain tissue necrosis (TN) are challenging treatment‐related effects mimicking tumor progression in patients with brain cancer. Affected patients frequently require surgery to guide management. PP and TN remain arbitrarily defined and insufficiently characterized. Lack of clear diagnostic criteria compromises treatment and may adversely affect outcome interpretation in clinical trials. The present findings in a cohort of patients with glioma with PP/TN suggest that both phenomena exhibit unique clinical and imaging characteristics, manifest in different patient populations, and should be classified as distinct clinical conditions. Increased familiarity with PP and TN key features may guide clinicians toward timely noninvasive diagnosis, circumvent potentially unnecessary surgical procedures, and improve response assessment in neuro‐oncology.
en
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.subject
Tissue necrosis
en
dc.subject
Pseudoprogression
en
dc.subject
Treatment-related effects
en
dc.subject
Malignant glioma
en
dc.subject
Neurotoxicity
en
dc.subject.ddc
600 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften::610 Medizin und Gesundheit::610 Medizin und Gesundheit
dc.title
Defining Treatment‐Related Adverse Effects in Patients with Glioma: Distinctive Features of Pseudoprogression and Treatment‐Induced Necrosis
dc.type
Wissenschaftlicher Artikel
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.doi
10.1634/theoncologist.2020-0085
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.journaltitle
The Oncologist
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.number
8
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.originalpublishername
Wiley
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pagestart
e1221
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pageend
e1232
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.volume
25
refubium.affiliation
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
refubium.funding
DEAL Wiley
refubium.resourceType.isindependentpub
no
dcterms.accessRights.openaire
open access
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pmid
32488924
dcterms.isPartOf.issn
1083-7159
dcterms.isPartOf.eissn
1549-490X