dc.contributor.author
Korte, Elisabeth
dc.contributor.author
Schilling, Ralph
dc.contributor.author
Balcerek, Magdalena
dc.contributor.author
Campbell, Helen
dc.contributor.author
Dirksen, Uta
dc.contributor.author
Herrmann, Gloria
dc.contributor.author
Kepakova, Katerina
dc.contributor.author
Kepak, Tomas
dc.contributor.author
Klco‐Brosius, Stephanie
dc.contributor.author
Kruseova, Jarmila
dc.contributor.author
Kunstreich, Marina
dc.contributor.author
Lackner, Herwig
dc.contributor.author
Langer, Thorsten
dc.contributor.author
Panasiuk, Anna
dc.contributor.author
Stefanowicz, Joanna
dc.contributor.author
Strauß, Gabriele
dc.contributor.author
Ranft, Andreas
dc.contributor.author
Byrne, Julianne
dc.contributor.author
Goldbeck, Lutz
dc.contributor.author
Borgmann‐Staudt, Anja
dc.date.accessioned
2022-03-14T12:44:00Z
dc.date.available
2022-03-14T12:44:00Z
dc.identifier.uri
https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/34380
dc.identifier.uri
http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/refubium-34098
dc.description.abstract
Objective:
As adolescent cancer patients may suffer from infertility following treatment, fertility counselling is essential. Our aim was to explore the current situation in four European countries in terms of (I) education about the risk for infertility, (II) counselling on fertility preservation, (III) patients' knowledge on fertility, (IV) sufficiency of information and (V) uptake of cryopreservation.
Methods:
In total, 113 patients (13–20 years) at 11 study centres completed a self-report questionnaire three and six months after cancer diagnosis. Multivariate logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).
Results:
As many as 80.2% of participants reported having received education about the risk for infertility prior to treatment, 73.2% recalled counselling on fertility preservation. Only 52.3% stated they felt sufficiently informed to make a decision. Inability to recall counselling on fertility preservation (OR = 0.03, CI: 0.00–0.47) and female gender (OR = 0.11, CI: 0.03–0.48) was associated with lower use of cryopreservation, whereas older age was associated with higher use.
Conclusion:
Fertility counselling was available to a relatively high proportion of patients, and it did influence the utilisation of cryopreservation. However, many patients did not feel sufficiently informed. Further improvement is needed to enable adolescent cancer patients to make an informed decision on fertility preservation.
en
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.subject
adolescent cancer patients
en
dc.subject
cryopreservation
en
dc.subject
fertility education
en
dc.subject
fertility impairment
en
dc.subject
fertility preservation
en
dc.subject
shared decision-making
en
dc.subject.ddc
600 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften::610 Medizin und Gesundheit::610 Medizin und Gesundheit
dc.title
Fertility education for adolescent cancer patients: Gaps in current clinical practice in Europe
dc.type
Wissenschaftlicher Artikel
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.articlenumber
e13279
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.doi
10.1111/ecc.13279
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.journaltitle
European Journal of Cancer Care
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.number
5
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.originalpublishername
Wiley
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.volume
29
refubium.affiliation
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
refubium.funding
DEAL Wiley
refubium.resourceType.isindependentpub
no
dcterms.accessRights.openaire
open access
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pmid
32567091
dcterms.isPartOf.issn
0961-5423
dcterms.isPartOf.eissn
1365-2354