dc.contributor.author
Pettier, Jean-Baptiste
dc.date.accessioned
2022-05-02T08:00:21Z
dc.date.available
2022-05-02T08:00:21Z
dc.identifier.uri
https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/33994
dc.identifier.uri
http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/refubium-33713
dc.description.abstract
Chinese practices of matchmaking have been controversial for over a century. Their continued transformations reveal a complex nexus of sentimental and material dimensions in the marriage-decision process at the heart of the negotiations between families and in their selections of proper candidates. This interplay between personal sentiments, concrete considerations, and the desire for success makes marriage controversial, as “love” is claimed and proclaimed at the same time. Moral debates around materialism, which have reverberated through the public sphere over the last decade, show how “love” acts as a tool of social reproduction while it also expresses sincere aspirations for an emotionally satisfying life. In comparative perspective, the complex of romantic love examined here reveals a recent, original synthesis of the tradition of parental arrangement and the political question of the place of love in modernity. The paper elucidates one of the contradictions within Chinese society today: the family remains central, but wider trends of individualization continue to unfold. A multifaceted understanding of love clarifies how it can bind families together while it also discourages others from pursuing romance.
en
dc.format.extent
27 Seiten
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.subject
romantic love
en
dc.subject
individualization
en
dc.subject.ddc
300 Sozialwissenschaften::300 Sozialwissenschaften, Soziologie::301 Soziologie, Anthropologie
dc.title
“A question of bank notes, cars, and houses!” Matchmaking and the Moral Economy of Love in Urban China
dc.type
Wissenschaftlicher Artikel
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.doi
10.1017/S0010417521000499
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.journaltitle
Comparative Studies in Society and History
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.number
2
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pagestart
510
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pageend
536
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.volume
64
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.url
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0010417521000499
refubium.affiliation
Politik- und Sozialwissenschaften
refubium.affiliation.other
Institut für Sozial- und Kulturanthropologie
refubium.funding
Open Access in Konsortiallizenz - Cambridge
refubium.note.author
Die Publikation wurde aus Open Access Publikationsgeldern der Freien Universität Berlin gefördert.
refubium.resourceType.isindependentpub
no
dcterms.accessRights.openaire
open access
dcterms.isPartOf.eissn
1475-2999