dc.contributor.author
Kallenberg, Jim Igor
dc.contributor.author
Eßler, Hannah L. M.
dc.date.accessioned
2022-02-03T08:43:56Z
dc.date.available
2022-02-03T08:43:56Z
dc.identifier.uri
https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/33846
dc.identifier.uri
http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/refubium-33565
dc.description.abstract
This text departs from a contradictory claim in deaf studies and sound studies: both disciplines describe a hierarchical regime of the sensible – visuocentrism and audiocentrism – which they try to counter with conceptualisations as “acoustemology” or “deaf gain.” However, as we argue, they both thereby erect what they claim to overcome: a sensual regime that privileges one sense over another and a restricted conception of subjectivity deriving from it. First, we draw a philosophical line in the critique of sensual regimes. Then we propose a figure for the transcendence of the separation of the sensible: in re-reading of the myth of Odysseus and the sirens, we engage various examples from literature, art, and acoustics to describe sirens as a mythological and technical archetype of the transcendence of the sensual regime, as well as reified subjectivity. The question, then, is not how to escape the sirens, but how they can be approached. It is necessary, we argue, for sound studies to develop a critical self-consciousness of its own restricted concepts in order to move from sonic thinking towards a sirenic thinking.
en
dc.format.extent
21 Seiten
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject
visuocentrism
en
dc.subject
audiocentrism
en
dc.subject
acoustic instrument
en
dc.subject
sonic thinking
en
dc.subject
acoustemology
en
dc.subject
sound studies
en
dc.subject.ddc
100 Philosophie und Psychologie::100 Philosophie::102 Verschiedenes
dc.title
Odyssey Towards a Sirenic Thinking: An Attempt at a Self-Criticism of the Listening Paradigm Within Sound Studies
dc.type
Wissenschaftlicher Artikel
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.doi
10.1515/opphil-2020-0182
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.journaltitle
Open Philosophy
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.number
1
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pagestart
231
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pageend
251
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.volume
4
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.url
https://doi.org/10.1515/opphil-2020-0182
refubium.affiliation
Philosophie und Geisteswissenschaften
refubium.affiliation.other
Institut für Theaterwissenschaft
![This authority value has been confirmed as accurate by an interactive user](/cache_202e45ad85b55efaeb29160f63cd3f3b/themes/FuCD/images/authority_control/invisible.gif)
refubium.resourceType.isindependentpub
no
dcterms.accessRights.openaire
open access
dcterms.isPartOf.eissn
2543-8875
refubium.resourceType.provider
WoS-Alert