dc.contributor.author
Yang, Bing‐Yi
dc.contributor.author
Gulinazi, Yierfulati
dc.contributor.author
Du, Yan
dc.contributor.author
Ning, Cheng‐Cheng
dc.contributor.author
Cheng, Ya‐Li
dc.contributor.author
Shan, Wei‐Wei
dc.contributor.author
Luo, Xue‐Zhen
dc.contributor.author
Zhang, Hong‐Wei
dc.contributor.author
Zhu, Quin
dc.contributor.author
Ma, Fenghua
dc.contributor.author
Liu, Jia
dc.contributor.author
Sun, Li
dc.contributor.author
Yu, Min
dc.contributor.author
Guan, Jun
dc.contributor.author
Chen, Xiaojun
dc.date.accessioned
2022-01-20T08:49:57Z
dc.date.available
2022-01-20T08:49:57Z
dc.identifier.uri
https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/33642
dc.identifier.uri
http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/refubium-33362
dc.description.abstract
Objective: To assess the efficacy of metformin in megestrol acetate (MA)-based fertility-sparing treatment for patients with atypical endometrial hyperplasia (AEH) and endometrioid endometrial cancer (EEC).
Design: A randomised, single-centre, open-label, controlled trial conducted between October 2013 and December 2017.
Setting: Shanghai OBGYN Hospital of Fudan University, China.
Population: A total of 150 patients (18-45 years old) with primary AEH or well-differentiated EEC were randomised into an MA group (n = 74) and an MA plus metformin group (n = 76).
Methods: Patients with AEH or EEC were firstly stratified, then randomised to receive MA (160 mg orally, daily) or MA (160 mg orally, daily) plus metformin (500 mg orally, three times a day).
Main outcomes and measures: The primary efficacy parameter was the cumulate complete response (CR) rate within 16 weeks of treatment (16w-CR rate); the secondary efficacy parameters were 30w-CR rate and adverse events.
Results: The 16w-CR rate was higher in the metformin plus MA group than in the MA-only group (34.3 versus 20.7%, odds ratio [OR] 2.0, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.89-4.51, P = 0.09) but the difference was more significant in 102 AEH patients (39.6 versus 20.4%, OR 2.56, 95% CI 1.06-6.21, P = 0.04). This effect of metformin was also significant in non-obese (51.4 versus 24.3%, OR 3.28, 95% CI 1.22-8.84, P = 0.02) and insulin-sensitive (54.8 versus 28.6%, OR 3.04, 95% CI 1.03-8.97, P = 0.04) subgroups of AEH women. No significant result was found in secondary endpoints.
Conclusion: As a fertility-sparing treatment, metformin plus MA was associated with a higher early CR rate compared with MA alone in AEH patients. Tweetable abstract For AEH patients, metformin plus MA might be a better fertility-sparing treatment to achieve a higher early CR rate compared with MA alone.
en
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject
Atypical endometrial hyperplasia
en
dc.subject
endometrioid endometrial cancer
en
dc.subject
fertility-sparing
en
dc.subject
megestrol acetate
en
dc.subject.ddc
600 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften::610 Medizin und Gesundheit::610 Medizin und Gesundheit
dc.title
Metformin plus megestrol acetate compared with megestrol acetate alone as fertility‐sparing treatment in patients with atypical endometrial hyperplasia and well‐differentiated endometrial cancer: a randomised controlled trial
dc.type
Wissenschaftlicher Artikel
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.doi
10.1111/1471-0528.16108
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.journaltitle
BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.number
7
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.originalpublishername
Wiley
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pagestart
848
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pageend
857
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.volume
127
refubium.affiliation
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
refubium.funding
DEAL Wiley
refubium.resourceType.isindependentpub
no
dcterms.accessRights.openaire
open access
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pmid
31961463
dcterms.isPartOf.issn
1470-0328
dcterms.isPartOf.eissn
1471-0528