dc.contributor.author
Keller, Lena
dc.contributor.author
Cortina, Kai S.
dc.contributor.author
Müller, Katharina
dc.contributor.author
Miller, Kevin F.
dc.date.accessioned
2022-05-02T07:14:41Z
dc.date.available
2022-05-02T07:14:41Z
dc.identifier.uri
https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/33426
dc.identifier.uri
http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/refubium-33147
dc.description.abstract
Instructional videos are widely used to study teachers’ professional vision. A new technological development in video research is mobile eye-tracking (MET). It has the potential to provide fine-grained insights into teachers’ professional vision in action, but has yet been scarcely employed. We addressed this research gap by using MET video feedback to examine how expert and novice teachers differed in their noticing and weighing of alternative teaching strategies. Expert and novice teachers’ lessons were recorded with MET devices. Then, they commented on what they observe while watching their own teaching videos. Using a mixed methods approach, we found that expert and novice teachers did not differ in the number of classroom events they noticed and alternative teaching strategies they mentioned. However, novice teachers were more critical of their own teaching than expert teachers, particularly when they considered alternative teaching strategies. Practical implications for the field of teacher education are discussed.
en
dc.format.extent
22 Seiten
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject
Mobile eye-tracking
en
dc.subject
Teacher training
en
dc.subject
Professional vision
en
dc.subject.ddc
300 Sozialwissenschaften::370 Bildung und Erziehung::370 Bildung und Erziehung
dc.title
Noticing and weighing alternatives in the reflection of regular classroom teaching: Evidence of expertise using mobile eye-tracking
dc.type
Wissenschaftlicher Artikel
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.doi
10.1007/s11251-021-09570-5
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.journaltitle
Instructional Science
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.number
2
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pagestart
251
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pageend
272
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.volume
50
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.url
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-021-09570-5
refubium.affiliation
Erziehungswissenschaft und Psychologie
refubium.affiliation.other
Arbeitsbereich Evaluation und Qualitätssicherung im Bildungswesen

refubium.resourceType.isindependentpub
no
dcterms.accessRights.openaire
open access
dcterms.isPartOf.eissn
1573-1952
refubium.resourceType.provider
WoS-Alert