dc.contributor.author
Busse, David
dc.contributor.author
Borghardt, Jens Markus
dc.contributor.author
Petroff, David
dc.contributor.author
Pevzner, Alice
dc.contributor.author
Dorn, Christoph
dc.contributor.author
El-Najjar, Nahed
dc.contributor.author
Huisinga, Wilhelm
dc.contributor.author
Wrigge, Hermann
dc.contributor.author
Simon, Philipp
dc.contributor.author
Kloft, Charlotte
dc.date.accessioned
2022-05-12T06:44:49Z
dc.date.available
2022-05-12T06:44:49Z
dc.identifier.uri
https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/33119
dc.identifier.uri
http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/refubium-32842
dc.description.abstract
Aims: The most suitable method for predicting the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) in obesity is currently debated. Therefore, multiple GFR/creatinine clearance prediction methods were applied to (morbidly) obese and nonobese patients ranging from moderate renal impairment to glomerular hyperfiltration and their predictions were rated based on observed fosfomycin pharmacokinetics, as this model drug is exclusively eliminated via glomerular filtration.
Methods: The GFR/creatinine clearance predictions via the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI), Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD; indexed and de-indexed by body surface area) and creatinine clearance via the Cockcroft–Gault formula (CLCRCG) using different body size descriptors were compared to the fosfomycin clearance (CLFOF) from 30 surgical patients (body mass index = 20.1–52.0 kg m−2), receiving 8000 mg as intravenous infusion.
Results: The concordance between CLFOF and creatinine clearance predictions was highest for CLCRCG employing either ideal body weight or adjusted body weight (if body mass >1.3 ideal body weight; CLCRCG_ABW-Schwartz, concordance-correlation coefficient [95% confidence interval] = 0.474 [0.156; 0.703], CCC) and GFR predictions via the de-indexed MDRD equation (concordance-correlation coefficient = 0.452 [0.137; 0.685]). The proportion of predicted GFR values within ±30% of the observed CLFOF (P30 = 72.3–76.7%) was only marginally lower than the reported P30 in the original CKD-EPI and MDRD publications (P30 = 84.1–90.0%).
Conclusion: This analysis represents a successful proof-of-concept for evaluating GFR/creatinine clearance prediction methods: Across all body mass index classes CLCRCG_ABW-Schwartz or the de-indexed MDRD were most suitable for predicting creatinine clearance/GFR also in (morbidly) obese, CKD stage <3B individuals in therapeutic use. Their application is proposed in optimising doses for vital therapies in obese patients requiring monitoring of renal function (e.g. methotrexate dosing).
en
dc.format.extent
9 Seiten
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.subject
creatinine-based equations
en
dc.subject
glomerular filtration rate
en
dc.subject
noncompartmental analysis
en
dc.subject
prediction of renal function
en
dc.subject.ddc
600 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften::610 Medizin und Gesundheit::615 Pharmakologie, Therapeutik
dc.title
Evaluating prediction methods for glomerular filtration to optimise drug doses in obese and nonobese patients
dc.type
Wissenschaftlicher Artikel
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.doi
10.1111/bcp.15115
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.journaltitle
British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.number
6
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pagestart
2973
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pageend
2981
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.volume
88
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.url
https://doi.org/10.1111/bcp.15115
refubium.affiliation
Biologie, Chemie, Pharmazie
refubium.affiliation.other
Institut für Pharmazie

refubium.funding
DEAL Wiley
refubium.note.author
Die Publikation wurde aus Open Access Publikationsgeldern der Freien Universität Berlin gefördert.
refubium.resourceType.isindependentpub
no
dcterms.accessRights.openaire
open access
dcterms.isPartOf.eissn
1365-2125
refubium.resourceType.provider
WoS-Alert