dc.contributor.author
Franke, Benedikt
dc.contributor.author
Brüning, Jan
dc.contributor.author
Yevtushenko, Pavlo
dc.contributor.author
Dreger, Henryk
dc.contributor.author
Brand, Anna
dc.contributor.author
Juri, Benjamin
dc.contributor.author
Unbehaun, Axel
dc.contributor.author
Kempfert, Jörg
dc.contributor.author
Sündermann, Simon
dc.contributor.author
Lembcke, Alexander
dc.contributor.author
Solowjowa, Natalia
dc.contributor.author
Kelle, Sebastian
dc.contributor.author
Falk, Volkmar
dc.contributor.author
Kuehne, Titus
dc.contributor.author
Goubergrits, Leonid
dc.contributor.author
Schafstedde, Marie
dc.date.accessioned
2021-10-28T08:57:59Z
dc.date.available
2021-10-28T08:57:59Z
dc.identifier.uri
https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/32418
dc.identifier.uri
http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/refubium-32142
dc.description.abstract
Background: In patients with aortic stenosis, computed tomography (CT) provides important information about cardiovascular anatomy for treatment planning but is limited in determining relevant hemodynamic parameters such as the transvalvular pressure gradient (TPG).
Purpose: In the present study, we aimed to validate a reduced-order model method for assessing TPG in aortic stenosis using CT data.
Methods: TPG(CT) was calculated using a reduced-order model requiring the patient-specific peak-systolic aortic flow rate (Q) and the aortic valve area (AVA). AVA was determined by segmentation of the aortic valve leaflets, whereas Q was quantified based on volumetric assessment of the left ventricle. For validation, invasively measured TPG(catheter) was calculated from pressure measurements in the left ventricle and the ascending aorta. Altogether, 84 data sets of patients with aortic stenosis were used to compare TPG(CT) against TPG(catheter).
Results: TPG(catheter) and TPG(CT) were 50.6 ± 28.0 and 48.0 ± 26 mmHg, respectively (p = 0.56). A Bland-Altman analysis revealed good agreement between both methods with a mean difference in TPG of 2.6 mmHg and a standard deviation of 19.3 mmHg. Both methods showed good correlation with r = 0.72 (p < 0.001).
Conclusions: The presented CT-based method allows assessment of TPG in patients with aortic stenosis, extending the current capabilities of cardiac CT for diagnosis and treatment planning.
en
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject
cardiac computed tomography
en
dc.subject
aortic stenosis
en
dc.subject
transvalvular pressure gradient
en
dc.subject
image-based modeling
en
dc.subject
reduced order model
en
dc.subject.ddc
600 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften::610 Medizin und Gesundheit::610 Medizin und Gesundheit
dc.title
Computed Tomography-Based Assessment of Transvalvular Pressure Gradient in Aortic Stenosis
dc.type
Wissenschaftlicher Artikel
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.articlenumber
706628
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.doi
10.3389/fcvm.2021.706628
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.journaltitle
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.originalpublishername
Frontiers Media SA
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.volume
8
refubium.affiliation
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
refubium.resourceType.isindependentpub
no
dcterms.accessRights.openaire
open access
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pmid
34568450
dcterms.isPartOf.eissn
2297-055X