dc.contributor.author
Möckel, Martin
dc.contributor.author
Stegemann, Miriam Songa
dc.contributor.author
Burst, Volker
dc.contributor.author
Kümpers, Philipp
dc.contributor.author
Risse, Joachim
dc.contributor.author
Koehler, Felix Carlo
dc.contributor.author
Schunk, Domagoj
dc.contributor.author
Hitzek, Jennifer
dc.contributor.author
Dietrich, Tamara Elene
dc.contributor.author
Slagman, Anna
dc.date.accessioned
2021-10-12T09:07:50Z
dc.date.available
2021-10-12T09:07:50Z
dc.identifier.uri
https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/32279
dc.identifier.uri
http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/refubium-32006
dc.description.abstract
Objectives: One major goal of the emergency department (ED) is to decide, whether patients need to be hospitalised or can be sent home safely. We aim at providing criteria for these decisions without knowing the SARS-CoV-2 test result in suspected cases.
Setting: Tertiary emergency medicine.
Participants: All patients were treated at the ED of the Charite during the pandemic peak and underwent SARS-CoV-2 testing. Patients with positive test results were characterised in detail and underwent a 14-day-follow-up.
Primary and secondary outcome measures: Logistic regression and classification and regression tree (CART) analyses were performed to identify predictors (primary endpoint), which confirm safe discharge. The clinical endpoint was all-cause mortality or need for mechanical ventilation during index stay or after readmission.
Results: The primary test population of suspected COVID-19 consisted of n=1255 cases, 45.2% were women (n=567). Of these, n=110 tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 (8.8%). The median age of SARS-CoV-2-positive cases was 45 years (IQR: 33-66 years), whereas the median age of the group tested negative for SARS-CoV-2 was 42 years (IQR: 30-60 years) (p=0.096). 43.6% were directly admitted to hospital care. CART analysis identified the variables oxygen saturation (<95%), dyspnoea and history of cardiovascular (CV) disease to distinguish between high and low-risk groups. If all three variables were negative, most patients were discharged from ED, and the incidence of the clinical endpoint was 0%. The validation cohort confirmed the safety of discharge using these variables and revealed an incidence of the clinical endpoint from 14.3% in patients with CV disease, 9.4% in patients with dyspnoea and 18.2% in patients with O-2 satuaration below 95%.
Conclusions: Based on easily available variables like dyspnoea, oxygen saturation, history of CV disease, approximately 25% of patients subsequently confirmed with COVID-19 can be identified for safe discharge.
en
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
dc.subject
accident & emergency medicine
en
dc.subject
health & safety
en
dc.subject.ddc
600 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften::610 Medizin und Gesundheit::610 Medizin und Gesundheit
dc.title
Which parameters support disposition decision in suspected COVID-19 cases in the emergency department (ED): a German clinical cohort study
dc.type
Wissenschaftlicher Artikel
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.articlenumber
e044853
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.doi
10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044853
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.journaltitle
BMJ Open
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.number
3
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.originalpublishername
BMJ Publishing Group
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.volume
11
refubium.affiliation
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
refubium.resourceType.isindependentpub
no
dcterms.accessRights.openaire
open access
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pmid
33789854
dcterms.isPartOf.eissn
2044-6055