dc.contributor.author
Amler, Anna-Klara
dc.contributor.author
Dinkelborg, Patrick H.
dc.contributor.author
Schlauch, Domenic
dc.contributor.author
Spinnen, Jacob
dc.contributor.author
Stich, Stefan
dc.contributor.author
Lauster, Roland
dc.contributor.author
Sittinger, Michael
dc.contributor.author
Nahles, Susanne
dc.contributor.author
Heiland, Max
dc.contributor.author
Kloke, Lutz
dc.contributor.author
Rendenbach, Carsten
dc.contributor.author
Beck-Broichsitter, Benedicta
dc.contributor.author
Dehne, Tilo
dc.date.accessioned
2021-09-23T09:45:40Z
dc.date.available
2021-09-23T09:45:40Z
dc.identifier.uri
https://refubium.fu-berlin.de/handle/fub188/32032
dc.identifier.uri
http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/refubium-31761
dc.description.abstract
Reconstruction of segmental bone defects by autologous bone grafting is still the standard of care but presents challenges including anatomical availability and potential donor site morbidity. The process of 3D bioprinting, the application of 3D printing for direct fabrication of living tissue, opens new possibilities for highly personalized tissue implants, making it an appealing alternative to autologous bone grafts. One of the most crucial hurdles for the clinical application of 3D bioprinting is the choice of a suitable cell source, which should be minimally invasive, with high osteogenic potential, with fast, easy expansion. In this study, mesenchymal progenitor cells were isolated from clinically relevant human bone biopsy sites (explant cultures from alveolar bone, iliac crest and fibula; bone marrow aspirates; and periosteal bone shaving from the mastoid) and 3D bioprinted using projection-based stereolithography. Printed constructs were cultivated for 28 days and analyzed regarding their osteogenic potential by assessing viability, mineralization, and gene expression. While viability levels of all cell sources were comparable over the course of the cultivation, cells obtained by periosteal bone shaving showed higher mineralization of the print matrix, with gene expression data suggesting advanced osteogenic differentiation. These results indicate that periosteum-derived cells represent a highly promising cell source for translational bioprinting of bone tissue given their superior osteogenic potential as well as their minimally invasive obtainability.
en
dc.rights.uri
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subject
tissue engineering
en
dc.subject
gelatin methacrylate
en
dc.subject
regenerative medicine
en
dc.subject
segmental bone defect
en
dc.subject
mesenchymal progenitor cell
en
dc.subject
osteogenic differentiation
en
dc.subject
stereolithography
en
dc.subject.ddc
600 Technik, Medizin, angewandte Wissenschaften::610 Medizin und Gesundheit::610 Medizin und Gesundheit
dc.title
Comparison of the Translational Potential of Human Mesenchymal Progenitor Cells from Different Bone Entities for Autologous 3D Bioprinted Bone Grafts
dc.type
Wissenschaftlicher Artikel
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.articlenumber
796
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.doi
10.3390/ijms22020796
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.journaltitle
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.number
2
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.originalpublishername
MDPI AG
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.volume
22
refubium.affiliation
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
refubium.resourceType.isindependentpub
no
dcterms.accessRights.openaire
open access
dcterms.bibliographicCitation.pmid
33466904
dcterms.isPartOf.eissn
1422-0067